User login
Rates of late preterm (34-36 weeks) and early preterm (37-38 weeks) births declined significantly in the United States between 2006 and 2014, according to a report published online July 26 in JAMA.
To examine temporal trends in early birth rates, investigators analyzed data in birth registries for six high-income Western countries, including the United States. They focused on singleton live births delivered at 22 or more weeks’ gestation in which the neonates weighed 500 g or more that occurred between 2006 and the most recent year for which data were available for each country. The study included more than 25.7 million U.S. births, 2.4 million in Canada, approximately 306,000 in Denmark, approximately 572,000 in Finland, approximately 469,000 in Norway, and approximately 738,000 in Sweden, Jennifer L. Richards, MPH, of the department of epidemiology, Emory University, Atlanta, and her associates reported.
During the study period, rates of late preterm birth significantly decreased from 6.8% to 5.7% in the United States and from 3.9% to 3.5% in Norway but remained essentially stable in the other countries. Rates of early term birth also decreased significantly from 31.2% to 24.4% in the United States, from 17.6% to 16.8% in Norway, and from 19.5% to 18.5% in Sweden but remained essentially constant in the other countries. The rates were adjusted for mother’s age at delivery and parity (JAMA. 2016;316[4]:410-9. doi:10.1001/jama.2016.9635).
Ms. Richards and her associates attempted to determine whether declining rates in early births correlated with declines in obstetric interventions, specifically labor inductions and prelabor cesarean deliveries, but they found only one such correlation, in the rate of early term births in the United States. Overall, the rates of clinician-initiated obstetric intervention declined from 48.9% in 2006 to 38.7% in 2014 among U.S. early term births. In all other cases, trends in obstetric interventions varied widely over time and from one country to the next. In addition, rates of late preterm and early term births in the United States declined comparably among deliveries in which there were no obstetric interventions, they noted.
The study was supported by the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, Paris Descartes University, the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science, and the Japan Ministry of Health, Labour, and Welfare. Ms. Richards reported having no financial disclosures; an associate reported receiving grants from the Uehara Memorial Foundation, the Kanzawa Medical Research Foundation, and the Danone Institute.
Reductions in early term births in the United States have been documented previously, and the investigators found an impressive decline in obstetric interventions among early term births from 48.9% in 2006 to 38.7% in 2014. This reduction may be the result of national and local efforts to reduce nonindicated deliveries prior to 39 weeks. In contrast, the rates of obstetric interventions among late preterm births were relatively constant over the years studied. Although reducing preterm birth is a major goal, sometimes late preterm birth is the best outcome for the mother and/or fetus, and these deliveries would require an obstetric intervention. Thus, the constant rate of obstetric interventions among late preterm births may be associated with a relatively smaller number of nonindicated late preterm births.
 |
Dr. Catherine Y. Spong |
Ms. Richards and her colleagues have provided a thoughtful multinational picture of late preterm and early term deliveries and their association with obstetric interventions. More data are needed to better understand the differences between countries and changes over time. Better tools and technologies to date pregnancies are now available, and, as studies continue to demonstrate, it is critical to wait until full term for delivery in uncomplicated pregnancies. Physicians, however, cannot become too devoted to decreasing late preterm and early term birth rates. For pregnancies in which there is a complication and when delivery will optimize the pregnancy outcome, delivery should occur and will require an obstetrical intervention.
Catherine Y. Spong, MD, is at the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development in Bethesda, Md. She reported having no relevant financial disclosures. These remarks are excerpted from an accompanying editorial (JAMA. 2016;316[4]:395-6).
Reductions in early term births in the United States have been documented previously, and the investigators found an impressive decline in obstetric interventions among early term births from 48.9% in 2006 to 38.7% in 2014. This reduction may be the result of national and local efforts to reduce nonindicated deliveries prior to 39 weeks. In contrast, the rates of obstetric interventions among late preterm births were relatively constant over the years studied. Although reducing preterm birth is a major goal, sometimes late preterm birth is the best outcome for the mother and/or fetus, and these deliveries would require an obstetric intervention. Thus, the constant rate of obstetric interventions among late preterm births may be associated with a relatively smaller number of nonindicated late preterm births.
|
Dr. Catherine Y. Spong |
Ms. Richards and her colleagues have provided a thoughtful multinational picture of late preterm and early term deliveries and their association with obstetric interventions. More data are needed to better understand the differences between countries and changes over time. Better tools and technologies to date pregnancies are now available, and, as studies continue to demonstrate, it is critical to wait until full term for delivery in uncomplicated pregnancies. Physicians, however, cannot become too devoted to decreasing late preterm and early term birth rates. For pregnancies in which there is a complication and when delivery will optimize the pregnancy outcome, delivery should occur and will require an obstetrical intervention.
Catherine Y. Spong, MD, is at the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development in Bethesda, Md. She reported having no relevant financial disclosures. These remarks are excerpted from an accompanying editorial (JAMA. 2016;316[4]:395-6).
Reductions in early term births in the United States have been documented previously, and the investigators found an impressive decline in obstetric interventions among early term births from 48.9% in 2006 to 38.7% in 2014. This reduction may be the result of national and local efforts to reduce nonindicated deliveries prior to 39 weeks. In contrast, the rates of obstetric interventions among late preterm births were relatively constant over the years studied. Although reducing preterm birth is a major goal, sometimes late preterm birth is the best outcome for the mother and/or fetus, and these deliveries would require an obstetric intervention. Thus, the constant rate of obstetric interventions among late preterm births may be associated with a relatively smaller number of nonindicated late preterm births.
|
Dr. Catherine Y. Spong |
Ms. Richards and her colleagues have provided a thoughtful multinational picture of late preterm and early term deliveries and their association with obstetric interventions. More data are needed to better understand the differences between countries and changes over time. Better tools and technologies to date pregnancies are now available, and, as studies continue to demonstrate, it is critical to wait until full term for delivery in uncomplicated pregnancies. Physicians, however, cannot become too devoted to decreasing late preterm and early term birth rates. For pregnancies in which there is a complication and when delivery will optimize the pregnancy outcome, delivery should occur and will require an obstetrical intervention.
Catherine Y. Spong, MD, is at the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development in Bethesda, Md. She reported having no relevant financial disclosures. These remarks are excerpted from an accompanying editorial (JAMA. 2016;316[4]:395-6).
Rates of late preterm (34-36 weeks) and early preterm (37-38 weeks) births declined significantly in the United States between 2006 and 2014, according to a report published online July 26 in JAMA.
To examine temporal trends in early birth rates, investigators analyzed data in birth registries for six high-income Western countries, including the United States. They focused on singleton live births delivered at 22 or more weeks’ gestation in which the neonates weighed 500 g or more that occurred between 2006 and the most recent year for which data were available for each country. The study included more than 25.7 million U.S. births, 2.4 million in Canada, approximately 306,000 in Denmark, approximately 572,000 in Finland, approximately 469,000 in Norway, and approximately 738,000 in Sweden, Jennifer L. Richards, MPH, of the department of epidemiology, Emory University, Atlanta, and her associates reported.
During the study period, rates of late preterm birth significantly decreased from 6.8% to 5.7% in the United States and from 3.9% to 3.5% in Norway but remained essentially stable in the other countries. Rates of early term birth also decreased significantly from 31.2% to 24.4% in the United States, from 17.6% to 16.8% in Norway, and from 19.5% to 18.5% in Sweden but remained essentially constant in the other countries. The rates were adjusted for mother’s age at delivery and parity (JAMA. 2016;316[4]:410-9. doi:10.1001/jama.2016.9635).
Ms. Richards and her associates attempted to determine whether declining rates in early births correlated with declines in obstetric interventions, specifically labor inductions and prelabor cesarean deliveries, but they found only one such correlation, in the rate of early term births in the United States. Overall, the rates of clinician-initiated obstetric intervention declined from 48.9% in 2006 to 38.7% in 2014 among U.S. early term births. In all other cases, trends in obstetric interventions varied widely over time and from one country to the next. In addition, rates of late preterm and early term births in the United States declined comparably among deliveries in which there were no obstetric interventions, they noted.
The study was supported by the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, Paris Descartes University, the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science, and the Japan Ministry of Health, Labour, and Welfare. Ms. Richards reported having no financial disclosures; an associate reported receiving grants from the Uehara Memorial Foundation, the Kanzawa Medical Research Foundation, and the Danone Institute.
Rates of late preterm (34-36 weeks) and early preterm (37-38 weeks) births declined significantly in the United States between 2006 and 2014, according to a report published online July 26 in JAMA.
To examine temporal trends in early birth rates, investigators analyzed data in birth registries for six high-income Western countries, including the United States. They focused on singleton live births delivered at 22 or more weeks’ gestation in which the neonates weighed 500 g or more that occurred between 2006 and the most recent year for which data were available for each country. The study included more than 25.7 million U.S. births, 2.4 million in Canada, approximately 306,000 in Denmark, approximately 572,000 in Finland, approximately 469,000 in Norway, and approximately 738,000 in Sweden, Jennifer L. Richards, MPH, of the department of epidemiology, Emory University, Atlanta, and her associates reported.
During the study period, rates of late preterm birth significantly decreased from 6.8% to 5.7% in the United States and from 3.9% to 3.5% in Norway but remained essentially stable in the other countries. Rates of early term birth also decreased significantly from 31.2% to 24.4% in the United States, from 17.6% to 16.8% in Norway, and from 19.5% to 18.5% in Sweden but remained essentially constant in the other countries. The rates were adjusted for mother’s age at delivery and parity (JAMA. 2016;316[4]:410-9. doi:10.1001/jama.2016.9635).
Ms. Richards and her associates attempted to determine whether declining rates in early births correlated with declines in obstetric interventions, specifically labor inductions and prelabor cesarean deliveries, but they found only one such correlation, in the rate of early term births in the United States. Overall, the rates of clinician-initiated obstetric intervention declined from 48.9% in 2006 to 38.7% in 2014 among U.S. early term births. In all other cases, trends in obstetric interventions varied widely over time and from one country to the next. In addition, rates of late preterm and early term births in the United States declined comparably among deliveries in which there were no obstetric interventions, they noted.
The study was supported by the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, Paris Descartes University, the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science, and the Japan Ministry of Health, Labour, and Welfare. Ms. Richards reported having no financial disclosures; an associate reported receiving grants from the Uehara Memorial Foundation, the Kanzawa Medical Research Foundation, and the Danone Institute.
FROM JAMA
Key clinical point: Late preterm and early term births declined in the United States between 2006 and 2014.
Major finding: Rates of late preterm birth significantly decreased from 6.8% to 5.7% in the United States and from 3.9% to 3.5% in Norway, but remained essentially stable in the other four countries analyzed.
Data source: A descriptive population-based retrospective study of early birth rates in six Western countries.
Disclosures: The study was supported by the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, Paris Descartes University, the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science, and the Japan Ministry of Health, Labour, and Welfare. Ms. Richards reported having no financial disclosures; an associate reported receiving grants from the Uehara Memorial Foundation, the Kanzawa Medical Research Foundation, and the Danone Institute.
