Article Type
Changed
Tue, 08/28/2018 - 10:45
Display Headline
Lack of further testing blamed for missed cancer

Orange County (NY) Supreme Court—After a routine examination in March 1998 showed an abnormal Pap result, a woman underwent a number of tests, including a CA-125, transabdominal and transvaginal ultrasound tests with color Doppler flow studies, endocervical curettage, and an endometrial biopsy to rule out endocervical cancer. The test results were normal, and a follow-up Pap in August 1998 also was normal. However, in January 1999, the patient was diagnosed with advanced-stage ovarian cancer. At that time, she had an abdominal hysterectomy followed by chemotherapy.

In suing, the woman claimed that because she had a family history of breast and ovarian cancer, the physician also should have performed a laparoscopy and referred her to a gynecologic oncologist.

The physician argued that since the laboratory and imaging results were all normal, there was no indication to perform additional testing. She believed the abnormal Pap was probably a false-positive reading. Lastly, she maintained that the ovarian cancer was not present during the tests performed in 1998 and that it most likely developed 2 to 4 months prior to diagnosis.

The jury returned a defense verdict.

The cases presented here were compiled by Lewis L. Laska, editor of Medical Malpractice Verdicts, Settlements & Experts. While there are instances when the available information is incomplete, these cases represent the types of clinical situations that typically result in litigation.

Article PDF
Author and Disclosure Information

Issue
OBG Management - 14(05)
Publications
Topics
Page Number
112-144
Sections
Author and Disclosure Information

Author and Disclosure Information

Article PDF
Article PDF

Orange County (NY) Supreme Court—After a routine examination in March 1998 showed an abnormal Pap result, a woman underwent a number of tests, including a CA-125, transabdominal and transvaginal ultrasound tests with color Doppler flow studies, endocervical curettage, and an endometrial biopsy to rule out endocervical cancer. The test results were normal, and a follow-up Pap in August 1998 also was normal. However, in January 1999, the patient was diagnosed with advanced-stage ovarian cancer. At that time, she had an abdominal hysterectomy followed by chemotherapy.

In suing, the woman claimed that because she had a family history of breast and ovarian cancer, the physician also should have performed a laparoscopy and referred her to a gynecologic oncologist.

The physician argued that since the laboratory and imaging results were all normal, there was no indication to perform additional testing. She believed the abnormal Pap was probably a false-positive reading. Lastly, she maintained that the ovarian cancer was not present during the tests performed in 1998 and that it most likely developed 2 to 4 months prior to diagnosis.

The jury returned a defense verdict.

The cases presented here were compiled by Lewis L. Laska, editor of Medical Malpractice Verdicts, Settlements & Experts. While there are instances when the available information is incomplete, these cases represent the types of clinical situations that typically result in litigation.

Orange County (NY) Supreme Court—After a routine examination in March 1998 showed an abnormal Pap result, a woman underwent a number of tests, including a CA-125, transabdominal and transvaginal ultrasound tests with color Doppler flow studies, endocervical curettage, and an endometrial biopsy to rule out endocervical cancer. The test results were normal, and a follow-up Pap in August 1998 also was normal. However, in January 1999, the patient was diagnosed with advanced-stage ovarian cancer. At that time, she had an abdominal hysterectomy followed by chemotherapy.

In suing, the woman claimed that because she had a family history of breast and ovarian cancer, the physician also should have performed a laparoscopy and referred her to a gynecologic oncologist.

The physician argued that since the laboratory and imaging results were all normal, there was no indication to perform additional testing. She believed the abnormal Pap was probably a false-positive reading. Lastly, she maintained that the ovarian cancer was not present during the tests performed in 1998 and that it most likely developed 2 to 4 months prior to diagnosis.

The jury returned a defense verdict.

The cases presented here were compiled by Lewis L. Laska, editor of Medical Malpractice Verdicts, Settlements & Experts. While there are instances when the available information is incomplete, these cases represent the types of clinical situations that typically result in litigation.

Issue
OBG Management - 14(05)
Issue
OBG Management - 14(05)
Page Number
112-144
Page Number
112-144
Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Display Headline
Lack of further testing blamed for missed cancer
Display Headline
Lack of further testing blamed for missed cancer
Sections
Article Source

PURLs Copyright

Inside the Article

Article PDF Media