European Groups Weigh In on SMI, Diabetes

VIENNA – A new joint position statement from three European medical organizations is aimed at reducing cardiovascular disease risk and improving diabetes care in people with severe mental illness, as well as improving their overall health and well-being.

The statement is from the European Psychiatric Association and supported by the European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD) and the European Society of Cardiology (www.em-consulte.com/article/223719

People with severe mental illnesses (SMI), including schizophrenia, depression, and bipolar disorder, have worse physical health and reduced life expectancy compared with the general population. Data suggest that they die years prematurely. It's also much harder for these individuals to access health care services, statement co-author Dr. Richard Holt said at the briefing.

People with SMI are more likely to be overweight, to smoke, and to have diabetes, hypertension, and dyslipidemia. Antipsychotics also can induce weight gain and worsen other metabolic cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk factors.

“The problem is that as well as the devastating effects of SMI, people with bipolar disorder and schizophrenia die on average 10-20 years earlier than the general population,” said Dr. Holt, of the department of endocrinology and metabolism at the University of Southampton (England) Because of the reduced access to physical health care services, the rate of screening for diabetes and CVD is significantly lower than that in the general population. In fact, while about 20% of diabetes in the general population is undiagnosed, that rate is about 70% among people with mental illness. People with mental illness also have high rates of untreated dyslipidemia and hypertension, he noted.

With this new statement, “We have an opportunity here of bringing together psychiatry and physical health services–in both primary care and secondary care–to try to address this problem, to increase the amount of screening for CV risk factors, to identify individuals at high risk, and to then come together with a strategy to treat them.”

“In putting together this statement, the three organizations have developed pragmatic guidelines,” he said. “Clearly, this is a collaborative effort.”

The document, for which the lead author was Dr. Marc De Hert of University Psychiatric Centre, Catholic University, Leuven Campus Kortenberg, Belgium, urges coordinated CVD risk assessment and management for this population, and names psychiatrists as often being the best placed to lead the health care team that ideally includes shared care arrangements between general and specialist health care services.

Establishing baseline CVD risk at initial presentation is advised, and recommendations are given for assessment of medical history and examination of all CVD risk factors, including lipids, glucose, smoking habit, and blood pressure. Electrocardiogram also is recommended. Monitoring should be carried out at regular intervals, depending on the patient's individual risk level. Weight should be closely monitored in patients taking psychotropic medications, the document advises.

Psychiatric centers and diabetes centers should cooperate in the care of patients with SMI and diabetes. A diabetes nurse-educator also should be involved in the care of those on insulin. The document also outlines management of blood lipids and blood pressure, along with smoking cessation counseling.

The choice of psychotropic medications should take into account the potential effects of the agent on CVD risk factors, particularly in overweight or obese patients. A dilemma may arise with clozapine, which is recommended by many guidelines as the antipsychotic of choice for patients with refractory schizophrenia, but it is also associated with the highest risk of weight gain and related CVD risk factors, the document says.

In the United States, a similar set of recommendations from the American Psychiatric Association, the American Diabetes Association, the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists, and the North American Association for the Study of Obesity was issued in 2004 (Diabetes Care 2004;27:596-61). In addition, the National Association of State Mental Health Program Directors (NASMHPD) issued similiar recommendations in 2006 and 2008 that are available at www.nasmhpd.org

In an interview, Dr. Joe Parks, lead author of the NASMHPD papers, said the problem in the United States is that it's often not clear who is responsible for ensuring that evidence-based standards of care are provided.

“Are the recommendations the responsibility of the individual health care provider? Or the local health care organizations such as hospitals and clinics? Or the payers such as private insurers and Medicaid? Because of this lack of accountability, implementation has been fragmented and spotty,” said Dr. Parks, medical director for the Missouri Department of Mental Health, Jefferson City.

Some U.S. states have made progress. The New York State Department of Mental Health, for example, has implemented tracking of obesity and blood pressure in its state-operated hospitals and clinics. In Missouri, the Department of Mental Health has just begun to require and fund annual screening and some interventions for obesity, blood pressure, diabetes, high cholesterol, and dyslipidemia in its programs serving people with mental illness for both Medicaid covered individuals and the uninsured.

Several private insurers encourage and attempt to incentivize clinics and individual providers to follow these recommendations, but Dr. Parks said he is unaware of any that actually require compliance.

“I don't know of any health care entity anywhere that delivers on all of either the American or European recommendations,” Dr. Parks said. “If we want to see widespread adoption of these kind of evidence-based standards of care, then the payers need to require it in their contracts, pay more when evidence-based standards of care are followed, and pay less when they are not. Within our current system if you really want something to happen routinely and systematically throughout the health care delivery system, there must be either a legal requirement or financial incentives. Everything else is just wishful thinking.”

The three organizations have developed pragmatic guidelines. This is a collaborative effort.

Source Dr. Holt

VIENNA – A new joint position statement from three European medical organizations is aimed at reducing cardiovascular disease risk and improving diabetes care in people with severe mental illness, as well as improving their overall health and well-being.

The statement is from the European Psychiatric Association and supported by the European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD) and the European Society of Cardiology (www.em-consulte.com/article/223719

People with severe mental illnesses (SMI), including schizophrenia, depression, and bipolar disorder, have worse physical health and reduced life expectancy compared with the general population. Data suggest that they die years prematurely. It's also much harder for these individuals to access health care services, statement co-author Dr. Richard Holt said at the briefing.

People with SMI are more likely to be overweight, to smoke, and to have diabetes, hypertension, and dyslipidemia. Antipsychotics also can induce weight gain and worsen other metabolic cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk factors.

“The problem is that as well as the devastating effects of SMI, people with bipolar disorder and schizophrenia die on average 10-20 years earlier than the general population,” said Dr. Holt, of the department of endocrinology and metabolism at the University of Southampton (England) Because of the reduced access to physical health care services, the rate of screening for diabetes and CVD is significantly lower than that in the general population. In fact, while about 20% of diabetes in the general population is undiagnosed, that rate is about 70% among people with mental illness. People with mental illness also have high rates of untreated dyslipidemia and hypertension, he noted.

With this new statement, “We have an opportunity here of bringing together psychiatry and physical health services–in both primary care and secondary care–to try to address this problem, to increase the amount of screening for CV risk factors, to identify individuals at high risk, and to then come together with a strategy to treat them.”

“In putting together this statement, the three organizations have developed pragmatic guidelines,” he said. “Clearly, this is a collaborative effort.”

The document, for which the lead author was Dr. Marc De Hert of University Psychiatric Centre, Catholic University, Leuven Campus Kortenberg, Belgium, urges coordinated CVD risk assessment and management for this population, and names psychiatrists as often being the best placed to lead the health care team that ideally includes shared care arrangements between general and specialist health care services.

Establishing baseline CVD risk at initial presentation is advised, and recommendations are given for assessment of medical history and examination of all CVD risk factors, including lipids, glucose, smoking habit, and blood pressure. Electrocardiogram also is recommended. Monitoring should be carried out at regular intervals, depending on the patient's individual risk level. Weight should be closely monitored in patients taking psychotropic medications, the document advises.

Psychiatric centers and diabetes centers should cooperate in the care of patients with SMI and diabetes. A diabetes nurse-educator also should be involved in the care of those on insulin. The document also outlines management of blood lipids and blood pressure, along with smoking cessation counseling.

The choice of psychotropic medications should take into account the potential effects of the agent on CVD risk factors, particularly in overweight or obese patients. A dilemma may arise with clozapine, which is recommended by many guidelines as the antipsychotic of choice for patients with refractory schizophrenia, but it is also associated with the highest risk of weight gain and related CVD risk factors, the document says.

In the United States, a similar set of recommendations from the American Psychiatric Association, the American Diabetes Association, the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists, and the North American Association for the Study of Obesity was issued in 2004 (Diabetes Care 2004;27:596-61). In addition, the National Association of State Mental Health Program Directors (NASMHPD) issued similiar recommendations in 2006 and 2008 that are available at www.nasmhpd.org

In an interview, Dr. Joe Parks, lead author of the NASMHPD papers, said the problem in the United States is that it's often not clear who is responsible for ensuring that evidence-based standards of care are provided.

“Are the recommendations the responsibility of the individual health care provider? Or the local health care organizations such as hospitals and clinics? Or the payers such as private insurers and Medicaid? Because of this lack of accountability, implementation has been fragmented and spotty,” said Dr. Parks, medical director for the Missouri Department of Mental Health, Jefferson City.

Some U.S. states have made progress. The New York State Department of Mental Health, for example, has implemented tracking of obesity and blood pressure in its state-operated hospitals and clinics. In Missouri, the Department of Mental Health has just begun to require and fund annual screening and some interventions for obesity, blood pressure, diabetes, high cholesterol, and dyslipidemia in its programs serving people with mental illness for both Medicaid covered individuals and the uninsured.

Several private insurers encourage and attempt to incentivize clinics and individual providers to follow these recommendations, but Dr. Parks said he is unaware of any that actually require compliance.

“I don't know of any health care entity anywhere that delivers on all of either the American or European recommendations,” Dr. Parks said. “If we want to see widespread adoption of these kind of evidence-based standards of care, then the payers need to require it in their contracts, pay more when evidence-based standards of care are followed, and pay less when they are not. Within our current system if you really want something to happen routinely and systematically throughout the health care delivery system, there must be either a legal requirement or financial incentives. Everything else is just wishful thinking.”

The three organizations have developed pragmatic guidelines. This is a collaborative effort.

Source Dr. Holt

VIENNA – A new joint position statement from three European medical organizations is aimed at reducing cardiovascular disease risk and improving diabetes care in people with severe mental illness, as well as improving their overall health and well-being.

The statement is from the European Psychiatric Association and supported by the European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD) and the European Society of Cardiology (www.em-consulte.com/article/223719

People with severe mental illnesses (SMI), including schizophrenia, depression, and bipolar disorder, have worse physical health and reduced life expectancy compared with the general population. Data suggest that they die years prematurely. It's also much harder for these individuals to access health care services, statement co-author Dr. Richard Holt said at the briefing.

People with SMI are more likely to be overweight, to smoke, and to have diabetes, hypertension, and dyslipidemia. Antipsychotics also can induce weight gain and worsen other metabolic cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk factors.

“The problem is that as well as the devastating effects of SMI, people with bipolar disorder and schizophrenia die on average 10-20 years earlier than the general population,” said Dr. Holt, of the department of endocrinology and metabolism at the University of Southampton (England) Because of the reduced access to physical health care services, the rate of screening for diabetes and CVD is significantly lower than that in the general population. In fact, while about 20% of diabetes in the general population is undiagnosed, that rate is about 70% among people with mental illness. People with mental illness also have high rates of untreated dyslipidemia and hypertension, he noted.

With this new statement, “We have an opportunity here of bringing together psychiatry and physical health services–in both primary care and secondary care–to try to address this problem, to increase the amount of screening for CV risk factors, to identify individuals at high risk, and to then come together with a strategy to treat them.”

“In putting together this statement, the three organizations have developed pragmatic guidelines,” he said. “Clearly, this is a collaborative effort.”

The document, for which the lead author was Dr. Marc De Hert of University Psychiatric Centre, Catholic University, Leuven Campus Kortenberg, Belgium, urges coordinated CVD risk assessment and management for this population, and names psychiatrists as often being the best placed to lead the health care team that ideally includes shared care arrangements between general and specialist health care services.

Establishing baseline CVD risk at initial presentation is advised, and recommendations are given for assessment of medical history and examination of all CVD risk factors, including lipids, glucose, smoking habit, and blood pressure. Electrocardiogram also is recommended. Monitoring should be carried out at regular intervals, depending on the patient's individual risk level. Weight should be closely monitored in patients taking psychotropic medications, the document advises.

Psychiatric centers and diabetes centers should cooperate in the care of patients with SMI and diabetes. A diabetes nurse-educator also should be involved in the care of those on insulin. The document also outlines management of blood lipids and blood pressure, along with smoking cessation counseling.

The choice of psychotropic medications should take into account the potential effects of the agent on CVD risk factors, particularly in overweight or obese patients. A dilemma may arise with clozapine, which is recommended by many guidelines as the antipsychotic of choice for patients with refractory schizophrenia, but it is also associated with the highest risk of weight gain and related CVD risk factors, the document says.

In the United States, a similar set of recommendations from the American Psychiatric Association, the American Diabetes Association, the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists, and the North American Association for the Study of Obesity was issued in 2004 (Diabetes Care 2004;27:596-61). In addition, the National Association of State Mental Health Program Directors (NASMHPD) issued similiar recommendations in 2006 and 2008 that are available at www.nasmhpd.org

In an interview, Dr. Joe Parks, lead author of the NASMHPD papers, said the problem in the United States is that it's often not clear who is responsible for ensuring that evidence-based standards of care are provided.

“Are the recommendations the responsibility of the individual health care provider? Or the local health care organizations such as hospitals and clinics? Or the payers such as private insurers and Medicaid? Because of this lack of accountability, implementation has been fragmented and spotty,” said Dr. Parks, medical director for the Missouri Department of Mental Health, Jefferson City.

Some U.S. states have made progress. The New York State Department of Mental Health, for example, has implemented tracking of obesity and blood pressure in its state-operated hospitals and clinics. In Missouri, the Department of Mental Health has just begun to require and fund annual screening and some interventions for obesity, blood pressure, diabetes, high cholesterol, and dyslipidemia in its programs serving people with mental illness for both Medicaid covered individuals and the uninsured.

Several private insurers encourage and attempt to incentivize clinics and individual providers to follow these recommendations, but Dr. Parks said he is unaware of any that actually require compliance.

“I don't know of any health care entity anywhere that delivers on all of either the American or European recommendations,” Dr. Parks said. “If we want to see widespread adoption of these kind of evidence-based standards of care, then the payers need to require it in their contracts, pay more when evidence-based standards of care are followed, and pay less when they are not. Within our current system if you really want something to happen routinely and systematically throughout the health care delivery system, there must be either a legal requirement or financial incentives. Everything else is just wishful thinking.”

The three organizations have developed pragmatic guidelines. This is a collaborative effort.

Source Dr. Holt