Article Type
Changed
Wed, 06/15/2016 - 05:00
Display Headline
Corticosteroid prophylaxis reduces GVHD in high-risk patients

Skin biopsy showing GVHD
Image courtesy of PLOS ONE

A team of researchers has found that risk-stratified, low-dose corticosteroid prophylaxis can significantly reduce the incidence of acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), accelerate platelet recovery, and reduce adverse events without increasing infections in patients who undergo haploidentical transplantation.

They believe this is the first test of a novel risk stratification–directed prophylaxis strategy. The strategy effectively prevented acute GVHD among patients who were at high risk for GVHD, without unnecessarily exposing patients who were at low risk to excessive toxicity from additional immunosuppressive agents.

To evaluate the prophylaxis strategy, the team enrolled 228 patients who underwent haploidentical transplant onto this controlled, open-label, randomized trial.

Corresponding author Xiao-Jun Huang, MD, of Peking University in Beijing, China, and colleagues reported the results in JCO.

The team stratified patients as high risk or low risk for developing GVHD based on biomarkers.

They categorized patients as high risk if they had CD4:CD8 ratios of 1.15 or greater in bone marrow grafts or more than 1.9 x 106/kg CD56bright NK cells in allogeneic grafts.

Patients who did not qualify for the high-risk group were considered to be low risk.

The team randomly assigned the high-risk patients to either receive or not receive the investigational intervention of methylprednisolone (MP).

All patients received cyclosporine, mycophenolate mofetil, and methotrexate for GVHD prevention.

Patients in any arm who developed acute GVHD higher than grade II received MP. If they did not respond, they received basiliximab.

Study population

Of the 228 patients enrolled, 83 were in the low-risk group, 72 in the high-risk experimental prophylaxis group, and 73 in the high-risk control group.

Patient characteristics were similar across all cohorts, including the conditioning regimens, except for their biomarker status.

Patients were a median age of about 30 years, (range 14 – 58), about half were male, and most had a diagnosis of acute myeloid leukemia or acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

GVHD incidence

The cumulative, 100-day incidence of acute GVHD grades II to IV was 21% in the high-risk prophylaxis arm.

This was similar to the incidence of 26% in the low-risk arm, P=0.43.

Both cohorts were significantly lower than the incidence of 48% in the high-risk control group, P<0.001.

Multivariate analysis showed that risk-stratified prophylaxis with low-dose corticosteroid significantly reduced the incidence of acute GVHD compared with no low-dose corticosteroid, with a hazard ratio of 0.66, P=0.007.

However, investigators found no differences between cohorts in the incidence of grades III to IV GVHD.

Corticosteroid-refractory acute GVHD developed in 14% of high-risk patients in the experimental arm, 18% in the control arm, and 23% in the low-risk group. Basiliximab, an anti-CD25 antibody, was used to treat it.

Hematopoietic and immune recovery

The median times to myeloid and platelet recovery were significantly shorter in the high-risk prophylaxis group (P<0.05 for both) and the low-risk group (P<0.05) than in the high-risk control group.

And immune reconstitution was comparable among all 3 cohorts.

Safety

Cumulative incidences among the low-risk, high-risk prophylaxis, and high-risk control groups, respectively, of cytomegalovirus reactivation (80%, 82%, 81%), Epstein-Barr virus reactivation (7%, 14%, 14%), post-transplantation lymphoproliferative disorder (0%, 1%, 4%), hemorrhagic cystitis (56%, 45%, 47%), bacteremia (13%, 10%, 11%), and invasive fungal infection (11%, 8%, 8%) were similar across the cohorts.

Osteonecrosis of the femoral head (P=0.034) and secondary hypertension (P=0.015) were significantly lower in the high-risk prophylaxis group than in the high-risk control group.

Transplant outcomes

Transplant outcomes, both relapse and non-relapse mortality at 100 days and 1 year, were similar among the 3 cohorts.

After a median follow-up of 505 days, the cumulative incidence of chronic GVHD was 44% in the high-risk prophylaxis group, 64% in the low-risk group, and 59% in the high-risk control group.

However, moderate to severe chronic GVHD was lower in the high-risk prophylaxis group, at 21%, compared to 50% in the low-risk group and 36% in the high-risk control group.

Thirty-two patients died of non-relapse causes, and the 3-year probabilities of leukemia-free survival and overall survival were similar among the 3 groups.

Publications
Topics

Skin biopsy showing GVHD
Image courtesy of PLOS ONE

A team of researchers has found that risk-stratified, low-dose corticosteroid prophylaxis can significantly reduce the incidence of acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), accelerate platelet recovery, and reduce adverse events without increasing infections in patients who undergo haploidentical transplantation.

They believe this is the first test of a novel risk stratification–directed prophylaxis strategy. The strategy effectively prevented acute GVHD among patients who were at high risk for GVHD, without unnecessarily exposing patients who were at low risk to excessive toxicity from additional immunosuppressive agents.

To evaluate the prophylaxis strategy, the team enrolled 228 patients who underwent haploidentical transplant onto this controlled, open-label, randomized trial.

Corresponding author Xiao-Jun Huang, MD, of Peking University in Beijing, China, and colleagues reported the results in JCO.

The team stratified patients as high risk or low risk for developing GVHD based on biomarkers.

They categorized patients as high risk if they had CD4:CD8 ratios of 1.15 or greater in bone marrow grafts or more than 1.9 x 106/kg CD56bright NK cells in allogeneic grafts.

Patients who did not qualify for the high-risk group were considered to be low risk.

The team randomly assigned the high-risk patients to either receive or not receive the investigational intervention of methylprednisolone (MP).

All patients received cyclosporine, mycophenolate mofetil, and methotrexate for GVHD prevention.

Patients in any arm who developed acute GVHD higher than grade II received MP. If they did not respond, they received basiliximab.

Study population

Of the 228 patients enrolled, 83 were in the low-risk group, 72 in the high-risk experimental prophylaxis group, and 73 in the high-risk control group.

Patient characteristics were similar across all cohorts, including the conditioning regimens, except for their biomarker status.

Patients were a median age of about 30 years, (range 14 – 58), about half were male, and most had a diagnosis of acute myeloid leukemia or acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

GVHD incidence

The cumulative, 100-day incidence of acute GVHD grades II to IV was 21% in the high-risk prophylaxis arm.

This was similar to the incidence of 26% in the low-risk arm, P=0.43.

Both cohorts were significantly lower than the incidence of 48% in the high-risk control group, P<0.001.

Multivariate analysis showed that risk-stratified prophylaxis with low-dose corticosteroid significantly reduced the incidence of acute GVHD compared with no low-dose corticosteroid, with a hazard ratio of 0.66, P=0.007.

However, investigators found no differences between cohorts in the incidence of grades III to IV GVHD.

Corticosteroid-refractory acute GVHD developed in 14% of high-risk patients in the experimental arm, 18% in the control arm, and 23% in the low-risk group. Basiliximab, an anti-CD25 antibody, was used to treat it.

Hematopoietic and immune recovery

The median times to myeloid and platelet recovery were significantly shorter in the high-risk prophylaxis group (P<0.05 for both) and the low-risk group (P<0.05) than in the high-risk control group.

And immune reconstitution was comparable among all 3 cohorts.

Safety

Cumulative incidences among the low-risk, high-risk prophylaxis, and high-risk control groups, respectively, of cytomegalovirus reactivation (80%, 82%, 81%), Epstein-Barr virus reactivation (7%, 14%, 14%), post-transplantation lymphoproliferative disorder (0%, 1%, 4%), hemorrhagic cystitis (56%, 45%, 47%), bacteremia (13%, 10%, 11%), and invasive fungal infection (11%, 8%, 8%) were similar across the cohorts.

Osteonecrosis of the femoral head (P=0.034) and secondary hypertension (P=0.015) were significantly lower in the high-risk prophylaxis group than in the high-risk control group.

Transplant outcomes

Transplant outcomes, both relapse and non-relapse mortality at 100 days and 1 year, were similar among the 3 cohorts.

After a median follow-up of 505 days, the cumulative incidence of chronic GVHD was 44% in the high-risk prophylaxis group, 64% in the low-risk group, and 59% in the high-risk control group.

However, moderate to severe chronic GVHD was lower in the high-risk prophylaxis group, at 21%, compared to 50% in the low-risk group and 36% in the high-risk control group.

Thirty-two patients died of non-relapse causes, and the 3-year probabilities of leukemia-free survival and overall survival were similar among the 3 groups.

Skin biopsy showing GVHD
Image courtesy of PLOS ONE

A team of researchers has found that risk-stratified, low-dose corticosteroid prophylaxis can significantly reduce the incidence of acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), accelerate platelet recovery, and reduce adverse events without increasing infections in patients who undergo haploidentical transplantation.

They believe this is the first test of a novel risk stratification–directed prophylaxis strategy. The strategy effectively prevented acute GVHD among patients who were at high risk for GVHD, without unnecessarily exposing patients who were at low risk to excessive toxicity from additional immunosuppressive agents.

To evaluate the prophylaxis strategy, the team enrolled 228 patients who underwent haploidentical transplant onto this controlled, open-label, randomized trial.

Corresponding author Xiao-Jun Huang, MD, of Peking University in Beijing, China, and colleagues reported the results in JCO.

The team stratified patients as high risk or low risk for developing GVHD based on biomarkers.

They categorized patients as high risk if they had CD4:CD8 ratios of 1.15 or greater in bone marrow grafts or more than 1.9 x 106/kg CD56bright NK cells in allogeneic grafts.

Patients who did not qualify for the high-risk group were considered to be low risk.

The team randomly assigned the high-risk patients to either receive or not receive the investigational intervention of methylprednisolone (MP).

All patients received cyclosporine, mycophenolate mofetil, and methotrexate for GVHD prevention.

Patients in any arm who developed acute GVHD higher than grade II received MP. If they did not respond, they received basiliximab.

Study population

Of the 228 patients enrolled, 83 were in the low-risk group, 72 in the high-risk experimental prophylaxis group, and 73 in the high-risk control group.

Patient characteristics were similar across all cohorts, including the conditioning regimens, except for their biomarker status.

Patients were a median age of about 30 years, (range 14 – 58), about half were male, and most had a diagnosis of acute myeloid leukemia or acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

GVHD incidence

The cumulative, 100-day incidence of acute GVHD grades II to IV was 21% in the high-risk prophylaxis arm.

This was similar to the incidence of 26% in the low-risk arm, P=0.43.

Both cohorts were significantly lower than the incidence of 48% in the high-risk control group, P<0.001.

Multivariate analysis showed that risk-stratified prophylaxis with low-dose corticosteroid significantly reduced the incidence of acute GVHD compared with no low-dose corticosteroid, with a hazard ratio of 0.66, P=0.007.

However, investigators found no differences between cohorts in the incidence of grades III to IV GVHD.

Corticosteroid-refractory acute GVHD developed in 14% of high-risk patients in the experimental arm, 18% in the control arm, and 23% in the low-risk group. Basiliximab, an anti-CD25 antibody, was used to treat it.

Hematopoietic and immune recovery

The median times to myeloid and platelet recovery were significantly shorter in the high-risk prophylaxis group (P<0.05 for both) and the low-risk group (P<0.05) than in the high-risk control group.

And immune reconstitution was comparable among all 3 cohorts.

Safety

Cumulative incidences among the low-risk, high-risk prophylaxis, and high-risk control groups, respectively, of cytomegalovirus reactivation (80%, 82%, 81%), Epstein-Barr virus reactivation (7%, 14%, 14%), post-transplantation lymphoproliferative disorder (0%, 1%, 4%), hemorrhagic cystitis (56%, 45%, 47%), bacteremia (13%, 10%, 11%), and invasive fungal infection (11%, 8%, 8%) were similar across the cohorts.

Osteonecrosis of the femoral head (P=0.034) and secondary hypertension (P=0.015) were significantly lower in the high-risk prophylaxis group than in the high-risk control group.

Transplant outcomes

Transplant outcomes, both relapse and non-relapse mortality at 100 days and 1 year, were similar among the 3 cohorts.

After a median follow-up of 505 days, the cumulative incidence of chronic GVHD was 44% in the high-risk prophylaxis group, 64% in the low-risk group, and 59% in the high-risk control group.

However, moderate to severe chronic GVHD was lower in the high-risk prophylaxis group, at 21%, compared to 50% in the low-risk group and 36% in the high-risk control group.

Thirty-two patients died of non-relapse causes, and the 3-year probabilities of leukemia-free survival and overall survival were similar among the 3 groups.

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Display Headline
Corticosteroid prophylaxis reduces GVHD in high-risk patients
Display Headline
Corticosteroid prophylaxis reduces GVHD in high-risk patients
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Disqus Comments
Default
Use ProPublica