Combo prolongs PFS in phase 3 MM trial

Vials of drug

Photo by Bill Branson

Results of the phase 3 ENDEAVOR trial suggest combination carfilzomib and dexamethasone prolongs progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (MM), when compared to bortezomib plus dexamethasone.

The median PFS was 18.7 months in the carfilzomib arm and 9.4 months in the bortezomib arm.

It is not clear whether this translates to an improvement in overall survival, as those data are not yet mature.

Treatment discontinuation due to adverse events (AEs) and on-study deaths were comparable between the treatment arms, although there were several AEs that occurred more frequently in the carfilzomib arm than the bortezomib arm.

These results were published in The Lancet Oncology. The trial was funded by Onyx Pharmaceuticals, Inc., a subsidiary of Amgen.

Patient treatment and characteristics

The ENDEAVOR trial included 929 patients with relapsed/refractory MM who had received 1 to 3 prior therapeutic regimens. They were randomized to receive carfilzomib in combination with low-dose dexamethasone (n=464) or bortezomib with low-dose dexamethasone (n=465) until progression.

Patients received carfilzomib as a 30-minute infusion on days 1, 2, 8, 9, 15, and 16 of 28-day treatment cycles, along with 20 mg of dexamethasone. For cycle 1 only, carfilzomib was administered at 20 mg/m² on days 1 and 2, followed by escalation to 56 mg/m² from day 8. Patients who tolerated 56 mg/m² in cycle 1 were kept at this dose for subsequent cycles.

Patients who received bortezomib (1.3 mg/m²) with low-dose dexamethasone (20 mg) were given bortezomib subcutaneously or intravenously at the discretion of the investigator. More than 75% of the patients received bortezomib subcutaneously.

Baseline characteristics were generally balanced between the treatment arms. Both arms had a median age of 65 (overall range, 30-89), and about half were male. Three-quarters of patients in both arms were white, a little over 10% were Asian, 2% were black, and about 10% did not report race/ethnicity.

A majority of patients in both arms (more than 90%) had an ECOG score of 0 or 1. Most patients (more than 60%) had standard-risk cytogenetics.

The median number of prior treatment regimens was 2 in both arms. Patients in both arms had received prior lenalidomide (38% in both arms), thalidomide (45% in the carfilzomib arm and 53% in the bortezomib arm), bortezomib (54% in both arms), and carfilzomib (<1% in both arms).

Results

The median PFS in the carfilzomib arm was roughly double that of the bortezomib arm—18.7 months and 9.4 months, respectively. The hazard ratio was 0.53 (P<0.0001).

Overall survival data are not mature and are still being monitored.

The overall response rate was 77% in the carfilzomib arm and 63% in the bortezomib arm (P<0.0001). The duration of response was 21.3 months and 10.4 months, respectively.

The proportion of patients achieving a very good partial response or better was 54.3% in the carfilzomib arm and 29% in the bortezomib arm (P<0.0001). The complete response rates were 13% and 6%, respectively (P<0.001).

Treatment discontinuation due to AEs and on-study deaths were comparable between the arms. There were 75 deaths in the carfilzomib arm and 88 deaths in the bortezomib arm.

Of the 263 patients in the carfilzomib arm who discontinued treatment, 65 did so because of AEs. Of the 351 patients in the bortezomib arm who discontinued treatment, 73 did so because of AEs.

A number of known AEs were reported at a higher rate in the carfilzomib arm than the bortezomib arm, including any-grade dyspnea (28% vs 13%), hypertension (25% vs 3%), pyrexia (27% vs 14%), cough (25% vs 15%), cardiac failure (8% vs 3%), and acute renal failure (8% vs 5%).

Rates of grade 3 or higher AEs were 73% in the carfilzomib arm and 67% in the bortezomib arm. Grade 3 or higher AEs of interest in the carfilzomib and bortezomib arms, respectively, were hypertension (9% vs 3%), dyspnea (5% vs 2%), cardiac failure (5% vs 2%), acute renal failure (4% vs 3%), ischemic heart disease (2% vs 2%), and pulmonary hypertension (0.6% vs 0.2%).

Vials of drug

Photo by Bill Branson

Results of the phase 3 ENDEAVOR trial suggest combination carfilzomib and dexamethasone prolongs progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (MM), when compared to bortezomib plus dexamethasone.

The median PFS was 18.7 months in the carfilzomib arm and 9.4 months in the bortezomib arm.

It is not clear whether this translates to an improvement in overall survival, as those data are not yet mature.

Treatment discontinuation due to adverse events (AEs) and on-study deaths were comparable between the treatment arms, although there were several AEs that occurred more frequently in the carfilzomib arm than the bortezomib arm.

These results were published in The Lancet Oncology. The trial was funded by Onyx Pharmaceuticals, Inc., a subsidiary of Amgen.

Patient treatment and characteristics

The ENDEAVOR trial included 929 patients with relapsed/refractory MM who had received 1 to 3 prior therapeutic regimens. They were randomized to receive carfilzomib in combination with low-dose dexamethasone (n=464) or bortezomib with low-dose dexamethasone (n=465) until progression.

Patients received carfilzomib as a 30-minute infusion on days 1, 2, 8, 9, 15, and 16 of 28-day treatment cycles, along with 20 mg of dexamethasone. For cycle 1 only, carfilzomib was administered at 20 mg/m² on days 1 and 2, followed by escalation to 56 mg/m² from day 8. Patients who tolerated 56 mg/m² in cycle 1 were kept at this dose for subsequent cycles.

Patients who received bortezomib (1.3 mg/m²) with low-dose dexamethasone (20 mg) were given bortezomib subcutaneously or intravenously at the discretion of the investigator. More than 75% of the patients received bortezomib subcutaneously.

Baseline characteristics were generally balanced between the treatment arms. Both arms had a median age of 65 (overall range, 30-89), and about half were male. Three-quarters of patients in both arms were white, a little over 10% were Asian, 2% were black, and about 10% did not report race/ethnicity.

A majority of patients in both arms (more than 90%) had an ECOG score of 0 or 1. Most patients (more than 60%) had standard-risk cytogenetics.

The median number of prior treatment regimens was 2 in both arms. Patients in both arms had received prior lenalidomide (38% in both arms), thalidomide (45% in the carfilzomib arm and 53% in the bortezomib arm), bortezomib (54% in both arms), and carfilzomib (<1% in both arms).

Results

The median PFS in the carfilzomib arm was roughly double that of the bortezomib arm—18.7 months and 9.4 months, respectively. The hazard ratio was 0.53 (P<0.0001).

Overall survival data are not mature and are still being monitored.

The overall response rate was 77% in the carfilzomib arm and 63% in the bortezomib arm (P<0.0001). The duration of response was 21.3 months and 10.4 months, respectively.

The proportion of patients achieving a very good partial response or better was 54.3% in the carfilzomib arm and 29% in the bortezomib arm (P<0.0001). The complete response rates were 13% and 6%, respectively (P<0.001).

Treatment discontinuation due to AEs and on-study deaths were comparable between the arms. There were 75 deaths in the carfilzomib arm and 88 deaths in the bortezomib arm.

Of the 263 patients in the carfilzomib arm who discontinued treatment, 65 did so because of AEs. Of the 351 patients in the bortezomib arm who discontinued treatment, 73 did so because of AEs.

A number of known AEs were reported at a higher rate in the carfilzomib arm than the bortezomib arm, including any-grade dyspnea (28% vs 13%), hypertension (25% vs 3%), pyrexia (27% vs 14%), cough (25% vs 15%), cardiac failure (8% vs 3%), and acute renal failure (8% vs 5%).

Rates of grade 3 or higher AEs were 73% in the carfilzomib arm and 67% in the bortezomib arm. Grade 3 or higher AEs of interest in the carfilzomib and bortezomib arms, respectively, were hypertension (9% vs 3%), dyspnea (5% vs 2%), cardiac failure (5% vs 2%), acute renal failure (4% vs 3%), ischemic heart disease (2% vs 2%), and pulmonary hypertension (0.6% vs 0.2%).

Vials of drug

Photo by Bill Branson

Results of the phase 3 ENDEAVOR trial suggest combination carfilzomib and dexamethasone prolongs progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (MM), when compared to bortezomib plus dexamethasone.

The median PFS was 18.7 months in the carfilzomib arm and 9.4 months in the bortezomib arm.

It is not clear whether this translates to an improvement in overall survival, as those data are not yet mature.

Treatment discontinuation due to adverse events (AEs) and on-study deaths were comparable between the treatment arms, although there were several AEs that occurred more frequently in the carfilzomib arm than the bortezomib arm.

These results were published in The Lancet Oncology. The trial was funded by Onyx Pharmaceuticals, Inc., a subsidiary of Amgen.

Patient treatment and characteristics

The ENDEAVOR trial included 929 patients with relapsed/refractory MM who had received 1 to 3 prior therapeutic regimens. They were randomized to receive carfilzomib in combination with low-dose dexamethasone (n=464) or bortezomib with low-dose dexamethasone (n=465) until progression.

Patients received carfilzomib as a 30-minute infusion on days 1, 2, 8, 9, 15, and 16 of 28-day treatment cycles, along with 20 mg of dexamethasone. For cycle 1 only, carfilzomib was administered at 20 mg/m² on days 1 and 2, followed by escalation to 56 mg/m² from day 8. Patients who tolerated 56 mg/m² in cycle 1 were kept at this dose for subsequent cycles.

Patients who received bortezomib (1.3 mg/m²) with low-dose dexamethasone (20 mg) were given bortezomib subcutaneously or intravenously at the discretion of the investigator. More than 75% of the patients received bortezomib subcutaneously.

Baseline characteristics were generally balanced between the treatment arms. Both arms had a median age of 65 (overall range, 30-89), and about half were male. Three-quarters of patients in both arms were white, a little over 10% were Asian, 2% were black, and about 10% did not report race/ethnicity.

A majority of patients in both arms (more than 90%) had an ECOG score of 0 or 1. Most patients (more than 60%) had standard-risk cytogenetics.

The median number of prior treatment regimens was 2 in both arms. Patients in both arms had received prior lenalidomide (38% in both arms), thalidomide (45% in the carfilzomib arm and 53% in the bortezomib arm), bortezomib (54% in both arms), and carfilzomib (<1% in both arms).

Results

The median PFS in the carfilzomib arm was roughly double that of the bortezomib arm—18.7 months and 9.4 months, respectively. The hazard ratio was 0.53 (P<0.0001).

Overall survival data are not mature and are still being monitored.

The overall response rate was 77% in the carfilzomib arm and 63% in the bortezomib arm (P<0.0001). The duration of response was 21.3 months and 10.4 months, respectively.

The proportion of patients achieving a very good partial response or better was 54.3% in the carfilzomib arm and 29% in the bortezomib arm (P<0.0001). The complete response rates were 13% and 6%, respectively (P<0.001).

Treatment discontinuation due to AEs and on-study deaths were comparable between the arms. There were 75 deaths in the carfilzomib arm and 88 deaths in the bortezomib arm.

Of the 263 patients in the carfilzomib arm who discontinued treatment, 65 did so because of AEs. Of the 351 patients in the bortezomib arm who discontinued treatment, 73 did so because of AEs.

A number of known AEs were reported at a higher rate in the carfilzomib arm than the bortezomib arm, including any-grade dyspnea (28% vs 13%), hypertension (25% vs 3%), pyrexia (27% vs 14%), cough (25% vs 15%), cardiac failure (8% vs 3%), and acute renal failure (8% vs 5%).

Rates of grade 3 or higher AEs were 73% in the carfilzomib arm and 67% in the bortezomib arm. Grade 3 or higher AEs of interest in the carfilzomib and bortezomib arms, respectively, were hypertension (9% vs 3%), dyspnea (5% vs 2%), cardiac failure (5% vs 2%), acute renal failure (4% vs 3%), ischemic heart disease (2% vs 2%), and pulmonary hypertension (0.6% vs 0.2%).