User login
according to findings from the prospective EPIMOMS study.
The population-based incidence of severe acute maternal morbidity occurring between 22 weeks’ of gestation and 42 days post partum in the 2012-2013 French multicenter study was 6.2% among 3,202 twin pregnancies and 1.3% among 179,107 singleton pregnancies, Hugo Madar, MD, MPH, of Bordeaux University Hospital, France, and colleagues reported on behalf of the EPIMOMS (Epidémiologie de la Morbidité Maternelle Sévère) study group.
For the current analysis – a population-based, cohort-nested, case-control analysis of study data – the investigators compared 2,500 case patients (8% had twin pregnancies) and 3,650 controls (2% had twin pregnancies) who did not experience severe acute maternal morbidity during that time period (odds ratio, 4.7). After accounting for confounding factors, the increased risk among women with twin versus singleton pregnancies persisted (OR, 4.2) during both the antepartum (OR, 4.1) and intrapartum/postpartum (OR, 4.2) periods.
The majority of events (77%) occurred during the latter periods, and the two most common underlying causal conditions were severe obstetric hemorrhage (66%) and severe hypertensive complications (20%); however, the increased risk in twin pregnancies was apparent, regardless of the underlying cause.
The cesarean delivery rates for twin versus singleton pregnancies were 72% and 34%, respectively, in the case group, and 58% and 18%, respectively, in the control group. A path analysis taking potential indication bias into account showed that 21% of the total risk of intrapartum or postpartum severe acute maternal morbidity risk associated with twin pregnancy was mediated by cesarean delivery, Dr. Madar and associates noted, explaining that, “in other words, if twin pregnancies had the same probability of cesarean delivery as singleton pregnancies, the association found between twin pregnancy and intrapartum or postpartum severe acute maternal morbidity would be reduced by one-fifth.”
This provides further support for limiting the use of cesarean for twin deliveries to cases with clear medical indications, as increasing the rate of vaginal deliveries may decrease the rate of severe acute maternal morbidity, they concluded.
EPIMOMS was supported by the National Research Agency and the Ile de France Regional Health Agency. Dr. Madar received a training grant from the Aquitaine Regional Health Agency. The authors reported having no other relevant financial disclosures.
SOURCE: Madar H et al. Obstet Gynecol. 2019;133:1141-50.
Twin pregnancies are known to be associated with increased risk of maternal morbidity, so the findings of this “very well-designed” study by Madar et al. are “not strikingly different than what we know,” according to Ozhan M. Turan, MD, PhD.
Given the robust statistical methods used, they do, however, offer one important new detail regarding the contribution of cesarean delivery to that risk: “This study demonstrated that 20% of complications are actually directly related with cesarean delivery,” Dr. Turan said in an interview.
These data alone will do little to change practice, but paired with an increased focus on training with respect to vaginal twin delivery – including in cases of breech presentation of the second baby – they could lead to improved maternal outcomes, he explained, adding that “breech extraction can be very fast and safe in skilled hands.”
Except for the lack of information in the study about whether the twins were monozygotic or dizygotic, the study is sound, and the data may prove useful for counseling patients about the risks and benefits of vaginal versus cesarean delivery and for promoting improved training of residents, maternal-fetal medicine fellows, and junior obstetricians in vaginal twin delivery techniques, he said.
Dr. Turan is director of the division of maternal and fetal medicine and of fetal therapy & complex obstetric surgery at the University of Maryland, Baltimore County. He reported having no relevant financial disclosures.
Twin pregnancies are known to be associated with increased risk of maternal morbidity, so the findings of this “very well-designed” study by Madar et al. are “not strikingly different than what we know,” according to Ozhan M. Turan, MD, PhD.
Given the robust statistical methods used, they do, however, offer one important new detail regarding the contribution of cesarean delivery to that risk: “This study demonstrated that 20% of complications are actually directly related with cesarean delivery,” Dr. Turan said in an interview.
These data alone will do little to change practice, but paired with an increased focus on training with respect to vaginal twin delivery – including in cases of breech presentation of the second baby – they could lead to improved maternal outcomes, he explained, adding that “breech extraction can be very fast and safe in skilled hands.”
Except for the lack of information in the study about whether the twins were monozygotic or dizygotic, the study is sound, and the data may prove useful for counseling patients about the risks and benefits of vaginal versus cesarean delivery and for promoting improved training of residents, maternal-fetal medicine fellows, and junior obstetricians in vaginal twin delivery techniques, he said.
Dr. Turan is director of the division of maternal and fetal medicine and of fetal therapy & complex obstetric surgery at the University of Maryland, Baltimore County. He reported having no relevant financial disclosures.
Twin pregnancies are known to be associated with increased risk of maternal morbidity, so the findings of this “very well-designed” study by Madar et al. are “not strikingly different than what we know,” according to Ozhan M. Turan, MD, PhD.
Given the robust statistical methods used, they do, however, offer one important new detail regarding the contribution of cesarean delivery to that risk: “This study demonstrated that 20% of complications are actually directly related with cesarean delivery,” Dr. Turan said in an interview.
These data alone will do little to change practice, but paired with an increased focus on training with respect to vaginal twin delivery – including in cases of breech presentation of the second baby – they could lead to improved maternal outcomes, he explained, adding that “breech extraction can be very fast and safe in skilled hands.”
Except for the lack of information in the study about whether the twins were monozygotic or dizygotic, the study is sound, and the data may prove useful for counseling patients about the risks and benefits of vaginal versus cesarean delivery and for promoting improved training of residents, maternal-fetal medicine fellows, and junior obstetricians in vaginal twin delivery techniques, he said.
Dr. Turan is director of the division of maternal and fetal medicine and of fetal therapy & complex obstetric surgery at the University of Maryland, Baltimore County. He reported having no relevant financial disclosures.
according to findings from the prospective EPIMOMS study.
The population-based incidence of severe acute maternal morbidity occurring between 22 weeks’ of gestation and 42 days post partum in the 2012-2013 French multicenter study was 6.2% among 3,202 twin pregnancies and 1.3% among 179,107 singleton pregnancies, Hugo Madar, MD, MPH, of Bordeaux University Hospital, France, and colleagues reported on behalf of the EPIMOMS (Epidémiologie de la Morbidité Maternelle Sévère) study group.
For the current analysis – a population-based, cohort-nested, case-control analysis of study data – the investigators compared 2,500 case patients (8% had twin pregnancies) and 3,650 controls (2% had twin pregnancies) who did not experience severe acute maternal morbidity during that time period (odds ratio, 4.7). After accounting for confounding factors, the increased risk among women with twin versus singleton pregnancies persisted (OR, 4.2) during both the antepartum (OR, 4.1) and intrapartum/postpartum (OR, 4.2) periods.
The majority of events (77%) occurred during the latter periods, and the two most common underlying causal conditions were severe obstetric hemorrhage (66%) and severe hypertensive complications (20%); however, the increased risk in twin pregnancies was apparent, regardless of the underlying cause.
The cesarean delivery rates for twin versus singleton pregnancies were 72% and 34%, respectively, in the case group, and 58% and 18%, respectively, in the control group. A path analysis taking potential indication bias into account showed that 21% of the total risk of intrapartum or postpartum severe acute maternal morbidity risk associated with twin pregnancy was mediated by cesarean delivery, Dr. Madar and associates noted, explaining that, “in other words, if twin pregnancies had the same probability of cesarean delivery as singleton pregnancies, the association found between twin pregnancy and intrapartum or postpartum severe acute maternal morbidity would be reduced by one-fifth.”
This provides further support for limiting the use of cesarean for twin deliveries to cases with clear medical indications, as increasing the rate of vaginal deliveries may decrease the rate of severe acute maternal morbidity, they concluded.
EPIMOMS was supported by the National Research Agency and the Ile de France Regional Health Agency. Dr. Madar received a training grant from the Aquitaine Regional Health Agency. The authors reported having no other relevant financial disclosures.
SOURCE: Madar H et al. Obstet Gynecol. 2019;133:1141-50.
according to findings from the prospective EPIMOMS study.
The population-based incidence of severe acute maternal morbidity occurring between 22 weeks’ of gestation and 42 days post partum in the 2012-2013 French multicenter study was 6.2% among 3,202 twin pregnancies and 1.3% among 179,107 singleton pregnancies, Hugo Madar, MD, MPH, of Bordeaux University Hospital, France, and colleagues reported on behalf of the EPIMOMS (Epidémiologie de la Morbidité Maternelle Sévère) study group.
For the current analysis – a population-based, cohort-nested, case-control analysis of study data – the investigators compared 2,500 case patients (8% had twin pregnancies) and 3,650 controls (2% had twin pregnancies) who did not experience severe acute maternal morbidity during that time period (odds ratio, 4.7). After accounting for confounding factors, the increased risk among women with twin versus singleton pregnancies persisted (OR, 4.2) during both the antepartum (OR, 4.1) and intrapartum/postpartum (OR, 4.2) periods.
The majority of events (77%) occurred during the latter periods, and the two most common underlying causal conditions were severe obstetric hemorrhage (66%) and severe hypertensive complications (20%); however, the increased risk in twin pregnancies was apparent, regardless of the underlying cause.
The cesarean delivery rates for twin versus singleton pregnancies were 72% and 34%, respectively, in the case group, and 58% and 18%, respectively, in the control group. A path analysis taking potential indication bias into account showed that 21% of the total risk of intrapartum or postpartum severe acute maternal morbidity risk associated with twin pregnancy was mediated by cesarean delivery, Dr. Madar and associates noted, explaining that, “in other words, if twin pregnancies had the same probability of cesarean delivery as singleton pregnancies, the association found between twin pregnancy and intrapartum or postpartum severe acute maternal morbidity would be reduced by one-fifth.”
This provides further support for limiting the use of cesarean for twin deliveries to cases with clear medical indications, as increasing the rate of vaginal deliveries may decrease the rate of severe acute maternal morbidity, they concluded.
EPIMOMS was supported by the National Research Agency and the Ile de France Regional Health Agency. Dr. Madar received a training grant from the Aquitaine Regional Health Agency. The authors reported having no other relevant financial disclosures.
SOURCE: Madar H et al. Obstet Gynecol. 2019;133:1141-50.
FROM OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY