Article Type
Changed
Fri, 09/02/2022 - 12:19

“[Operative vaginal delivery] was used in only 3% of all US births in 2013, a shift from approximately 30% in 1987,” reported Hayley M. Miller, MD, and Danielle M. Panelli, MD, in the June issue of OBG Management. In their article, “How are maternal and neonatal outcomes impacted by the contemporary practice of operative vaginal delivery [OVD],” the authors mentioned that level of experience by the operator can bias reported complication rates of OVD. Although they examined evidence that found the absolute risk of neonatal trauma to be low following OVD, perineal lacerations “appeared to remain a major driver of maternal morbidity….” Given the current infrequency of OVD, they urged that training be prioritized so OVD can be offered as a safe alternative to cesarean delivery. OBG Management followed up with a poll for readers to ask, “Are you comfortable performing OVD as an alternative to cesarean?”

Poll results

A total of 302 readers cast their vote:

81.1% (245 readers) said yes

18.9% (57 readers) said no

 

 
Article PDF
Issue
OBG Management - 34(6)
Publications
Topics
Page Number
35
Article PDF
Article PDF

“[Operative vaginal delivery] was used in only 3% of all US births in 2013, a shift from approximately 30% in 1987,” reported Hayley M. Miller, MD, and Danielle M. Panelli, MD, in the June issue of OBG Management. In their article, “How are maternal and neonatal outcomes impacted by the contemporary practice of operative vaginal delivery [OVD],” the authors mentioned that level of experience by the operator can bias reported complication rates of OVD. Although they examined evidence that found the absolute risk of neonatal trauma to be low following OVD, perineal lacerations “appeared to remain a major driver of maternal morbidity….” Given the current infrequency of OVD, they urged that training be prioritized so OVD can be offered as a safe alternative to cesarean delivery. OBG Management followed up with a poll for readers to ask, “Are you comfortable performing OVD as an alternative to cesarean?”

Poll results

A total of 302 readers cast their vote:

81.1% (245 readers) said yes

18.9% (57 readers) said no

 

 

“[Operative vaginal delivery] was used in only 3% of all US births in 2013, a shift from approximately 30% in 1987,” reported Hayley M. Miller, MD, and Danielle M. Panelli, MD, in the June issue of OBG Management. In their article, “How are maternal and neonatal outcomes impacted by the contemporary practice of operative vaginal delivery [OVD],” the authors mentioned that level of experience by the operator can bias reported complication rates of OVD. Although they examined evidence that found the absolute risk of neonatal trauma to be low following OVD, perineal lacerations “appeared to remain a major driver of maternal morbidity….” Given the current infrequency of OVD, they urged that training be prioritized so OVD can be offered as a safe alternative to cesarean delivery. OBG Management followed up with a poll for readers to ask, “Are you comfortable performing OVD as an alternative to cesarean?”

Poll results

A total of 302 readers cast their vote:

81.1% (245 readers) said yes

18.9% (57 readers) said no

 

 
Issue
OBG Management - 34(6)
Issue
OBG Management - 34(6)
Page Number
35
Page Number
35
Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Disqus Comments
Default
Eyebrow Default
Poll results
Gate On Date
Tue, 06/28/2022 - 12:15
Un-Gate On Date
Tue, 06/28/2022 - 12:15
Use ProPublica
CFC Schedule Remove Status
Tue, 06/28/2022 - 12:15
Hide sidebar & use full width
render the right sidebar.
Conference Recap Checkbox
Not Conference Recap
Clinical Edge
Display the Slideshow in this Article
Medscape Article
Display survey writer
Reuters content
Disable Inline Native ads
WebMD Article
Article PDF Media