Breast Cancer ICYMI

SAN ANTONIO – Data continue to underscore the benefits of lifestyle interventions in women with breast cancer, but questions remain about their effects on recurrence, according to Jennifer Ligibel, MD.

Findings from the EBBA-II trial as presented at the San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium, for example, showed that exercise improves cardiorespiratory fitness in women with early breast cancer, and findings from the SUCCESS C study showed that breast cancer patients who completed a weight-loss intervention showed some improvements, compared with those who did not, said Dr. Ligibel of Dana-Farber Cancer Institute in Boston, who was the discussant for those and other lifestyle-intervention studies at the symposium.

SUCCESS C failed to show an overall reduction in breast cancer recurrence or survival, but weight loss among intervention-group participants was modest, and more than half of the participants dropped out of the study, so it’s hard to make any firm conclusions, she said.

Overall, the findings – in the context of what is already known about lifestyle interventions among women with breast cancer – provide “yet another reason to tell women that it’s important to exercise during treatment,” she said.

Vidyard Video

In this video interview, Dr. Ligibel discussed the studies and the implications of the findings, and also mentioned an ongoing study for which she is an investigator. In that study – the Breast Cancer Weight Loss study (BWEL) – adherence among the approximately 1,700 women enrolled has been high. “So we’re hoping that this study in a few years will give us a bit more information about the power of weight loss to potentially reduce recurrence.”

For now, the available data show that there are “lots of concrete benefits” associated with improving lifestyle in women with breast cancer, she said, noting that she tells all of her patients to live as healthy a lifestyle as possible, and especially to exercise.

[email protected]

SAN ANTONIO – Data continue to underscore the benefits of lifestyle interventions in women with breast cancer, but questions remain about their effects on recurrence, according to Jennifer Ligibel, MD.

Findings from the EBBA-II trial as presented at the San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium, for example, showed that exercise improves cardiorespiratory fitness in women with early breast cancer, and findings from the SUCCESS C study showed that breast cancer patients who completed a weight-loss intervention showed some improvements, compared with those who did not, said Dr. Ligibel of Dana-Farber Cancer Institute in Boston, who was the discussant for those and other lifestyle-intervention studies at the symposium.

SUCCESS C failed to show an overall reduction in breast cancer recurrence or survival, but weight loss among intervention-group participants was modest, and more than half of the participants dropped out of the study, so it’s hard to make any firm conclusions, she said.

Overall, the findings – in the context of what is already known about lifestyle interventions among women with breast cancer – provide “yet another reason to tell women that it’s important to exercise during treatment,” she said.

Vidyard Video

In this video interview, Dr. Ligibel discussed the studies and the implications of the findings, and also mentioned an ongoing study for which she is an investigator. In that study – the Breast Cancer Weight Loss study (BWEL) – adherence among the approximately 1,700 women enrolled has been high. “So we’re hoping that this study in a few years will give us a bit more information about the power of weight loss to potentially reduce recurrence.”

For now, the available data show that there are “lots of concrete benefits” associated with improving lifestyle in women with breast cancer, she said, noting that she tells all of her patients to live as healthy a lifestyle as possible, and especially to exercise.

[email protected]

SAN ANTONIO – Data continue to underscore the benefits of lifestyle interventions in women with breast cancer, but questions remain about their effects on recurrence, according to Jennifer Ligibel, MD.

Findings from the EBBA-II trial as presented at the San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium, for example, showed that exercise improves cardiorespiratory fitness in women with early breast cancer, and findings from the SUCCESS C study showed that breast cancer patients who completed a weight-loss intervention showed some improvements, compared with those who did not, said Dr. Ligibel of Dana-Farber Cancer Institute in Boston, who was the discussant for those and other lifestyle-intervention studies at the symposium.

SUCCESS C failed to show an overall reduction in breast cancer recurrence or survival, but weight loss among intervention-group participants was modest, and more than half of the participants dropped out of the study, so it’s hard to make any firm conclusions, she said.

Overall, the findings – in the context of what is already known about lifestyle interventions among women with breast cancer – provide “yet another reason to tell women that it’s important to exercise during treatment,” she said.

Vidyard Video

In this video interview, Dr. Ligibel discussed the studies and the implications of the findings, and also mentioned an ongoing study for which she is an investigator. In that study – the Breast Cancer Weight Loss study (BWEL) – adherence among the approximately 1,700 women enrolled has been high. “So we’re hoping that this study in a few years will give us a bit more information about the power of weight loss to potentially reduce recurrence.”

For now, the available data show that there are “lots of concrete benefits” associated with improving lifestyle in women with breast cancer, she said, noting that she tells all of her patients to live as healthy a lifestyle as possible, and especially to exercise.

[email protected]

Women with active migraines are less likely to have type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and show a decrease in migraine symptoms prior to diagnosis of T2DM, indicating an inverse relationship between hyperglycemia, hyperinsulinism, and migraines, according to recent research published in JAMA Neurology.

“Because plasma glucose concentration rises with time up to the point of type 2 diabetes occurrence, the prevalence of migraine symptoms may decrease,” Guy Fagherazzi, PhD, at the Center for Research in Epidemiology and Population Health at the Gustave Roussy Institute in Villejuif, France, and his colleagues wrote in their study. “Consequently, tracking the evolution and especially the decrease of migraine frequency in individuals with migraine at high risk of diabetes, such as individuals with obesity, irrespective of age could be the sign of an emerging increased blood glucose levels, prediabetes, or type 2 diabetes.”

The researchers used data from the prospective Etude Epidémiologique Auprès des Femmes de la Mutuelle Générale de l’Education Nationale (E3N) study, initiated in 1990 and identified 74,247 women (mean age, 61 years old) with self-reported migraine in a 2002 follow-up questionnaire who had 10-year follow-up data during 2004-2014. The women in the cohort were born during 1925-1950 and completed biennial questionnaires about their health, including migraine status and medications, since 1992. The participants were divided into groups based on no migraine (49,199 participants), active migraine (7,839 participants), or prior migraine history (17,209 participants), and patients with T2DM at baseline were excluded.

Dr. Fagherazzi and his colleagues found 2,372 cases of type 2 diabetes over the follow-up period. Women who had active migraine status were less likely to have T2DM (hazard ratio, 0.80; 95% confidence interval, 0.67-0.96) than were the participants who did not have migraines, and this inverse association persisted after the researchers adjusted for factors such as myocardial infarction, education level, family history of diabetes, body mass index, smoking status, hypertension, physical activity, oral contraceptive use, menopausal status, menopausal hormone therapy, handedness, antimigraine preparations, and other prescribed migraine drugs (HR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.58-0.85).

In the participants who developed T2DM, the researchers also found that there was a decrease in the prevalence of active migraine in the 24 years prior to T2DM diagnosis from 22% (95% CI, 16%-27%) to 11% (95% CI, 10%-12%) after adjusting for T2DM risk factors, which was then followed by an up to 22-year plateau in migraine prevalence of 11% for these participants.

“The linear decrease of migraine prevalence long before and the plateau long after type 2 diabetes diagnosis is novel and the association deserves to be studied in other populations,” Dr. Fagherazzi and his colleagues wrote. “The potential beneficial role of both hyperglycemia and hyperinsulinism on migraine occurrence needs to be further explored.”

The researchers noted limitations in the study, such as self-reported migraine by participants in the cohort, exclusion of non–pharmacologically treated T2DM cases, observational nature of the study, and homogenized population in the E3N cohort consisting of mainly women in menopause who were teachers and belonged to the same health insurance plan.

This study was funded by a grant from the French Research agency. The E3N cohort study was funded by the “Mutuelle Générale de l’Education Nationale,” European Community, French League against Cancer, Gustave Roussy, and French Institute of Health and Medical Research. Dr. Kurth is an advisory board member for CoLucid and has received funding for a research project from Amgen, honoraria from Lilly, lecture support from Novartis and Daiichi Sankyo, and travel support from the International Headache Society, as well as provided BMJ with editorial services.

SOURCE: Fagherazzi G et al. JAMA Neurol. 2018. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2018.3960.

Women with active migraines are less likely to have type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and show a decrease in migraine symptoms prior to diagnosis of T2DM, indicating an inverse relationship between hyperglycemia, hyperinsulinism, and migraines, according to recent research published in JAMA Neurology.

“Because plasma glucose concentration rises with time up to the point of type 2 diabetes occurrence, the prevalence of migraine symptoms may decrease,” Guy Fagherazzi, PhD, at the Center for Research in Epidemiology and Population Health at the Gustave Roussy Institute in Villejuif, France, and his colleagues wrote in their study. “Consequently, tracking the evolution and especially the decrease of migraine frequency in individuals with migraine at high risk of diabetes, such as individuals with obesity, irrespective of age could be the sign of an emerging increased blood glucose levels, prediabetes, or type 2 diabetes.”

The researchers used data from the prospective Etude Epidémiologique Auprès des Femmes de la Mutuelle Générale de l’Education Nationale (E3N) study, initiated in 1990 and identified 74,247 women (mean age, 61 years old) with self-reported migraine in a 2002 follow-up questionnaire who had 10-year follow-up data during 2004-2014. The women in the cohort were born during 1925-1950 and completed biennial questionnaires about their health, including migraine status and medications, since 1992. The participants were divided into groups based on no migraine (49,199 participants), active migraine (7,839 participants), or prior migraine history (17,209 participants), and patients with T2DM at baseline were excluded.

Dr. Fagherazzi and his colleagues found 2,372 cases of type 2 diabetes over the follow-up period. Women who had active migraine status were less likely to have T2DM (hazard ratio, 0.80; 95% confidence interval, 0.67-0.96) than were the participants who did not have migraines, and this inverse association persisted after the researchers adjusted for factors such as myocardial infarction, education level, family history of diabetes, body mass index, smoking status, hypertension, physical activity, oral contraceptive use, menopausal status, menopausal hormone therapy, handedness, antimigraine preparations, and other prescribed migraine drugs (HR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.58-0.85).

In the participants who developed T2DM, the researchers also found that there was a decrease in the prevalence of active migraine in the 24 years prior to T2DM diagnosis from 22% (95% CI, 16%-27%) to 11% (95% CI, 10%-12%) after adjusting for T2DM risk factors, which was then followed by an up to 22-year plateau in migraine prevalence of 11% for these participants.

“The linear decrease of migraine prevalence long before and the plateau long after type 2 diabetes diagnosis is novel and the association deserves to be studied in other populations,” Dr. Fagherazzi and his colleagues wrote. “The potential beneficial role of both hyperglycemia and hyperinsulinism on migraine occurrence needs to be further explored.”

The researchers noted limitations in the study, such as self-reported migraine by participants in the cohort, exclusion of non–pharmacologically treated T2DM cases, observational nature of the study, and homogenized population in the E3N cohort consisting of mainly women in menopause who were teachers and belonged to the same health insurance plan.

This study was funded by a grant from the French Research agency. The E3N cohort study was funded by the “Mutuelle Générale de l’Education Nationale,” European Community, French League against Cancer, Gustave Roussy, and French Institute of Health and Medical Research. Dr. Kurth is an advisory board member for CoLucid and has received funding for a research project from Amgen, honoraria from Lilly, lecture support from Novartis and Daiichi Sankyo, and travel support from the International Headache Society, as well as provided BMJ with editorial services.

SOURCE: Fagherazzi G et al. JAMA Neurol. 2018. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2018.3960.

Women with active migraines are less likely to have type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and show a decrease in migraine symptoms prior to diagnosis of T2DM, indicating an inverse relationship between hyperglycemia, hyperinsulinism, and migraines, according to recent research published in JAMA Neurology.

“Because plasma glucose concentration rises with time up to the point of type 2 diabetes occurrence, the prevalence of migraine symptoms may decrease,” Guy Fagherazzi, PhD, at the Center for Research in Epidemiology and Population Health at the Gustave Roussy Institute in Villejuif, France, and his colleagues wrote in their study. “Consequently, tracking the evolution and especially the decrease of migraine frequency in individuals with migraine at high risk of diabetes, such as individuals with obesity, irrespective of age could be the sign of an emerging increased blood glucose levels, prediabetes, or type 2 diabetes.”

The researchers used data from the prospective Etude Epidémiologique Auprès des Femmes de la Mutuelle Générale de l’Education Nationale (E3N) study, initiated in 1990 and identified 74,247 women (mean age, 61 years old) with self-reported migraine in a 2002 follow-up questionnaire who had 10-year follow-up data during 2004-2014. The women in the cohort were born during 1925-1950 and completed biennial questionnaires about their health, including migraine status and medications, since 1992. The participants were divided into groups based on no migraine (49,199 participants), active migraine (7,839 participants), or prior migraine history (17,209 participants), and patients with T2DM at baseline were excluded.

Dr. Fagherazzi and his colleagues found 2,372 cases of type 2 diabetes over the follow-up period. Women who had active migraine status were less likely to have T2DM (hazard ratio, 0.80; 95% confidence interval, 0.67-0.96) than were the participants who did not have migraines, and this inverse association persisted after the researchers adjusted for factors such as myocardial infarction, education level, family history of diabetes, body mass index, smoking status, hypertension, physical activity, oral contraceptive use, menopausal status, menopausal hormone therapy, handedness, antimigraine preparations, and other prescribed migraine drugs (HR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.58-0.85).

In the participants who developed T2DM, the researchers also found that there was a decrease in the prevalence of active migraine in the 24 years prior to T2DM diagnosis from 22% (95% CI, 16%-27%) to 11% (95% CI, 10%-12%) after adjusting for T2DM risk factors, which was then followed by an up to 22-year plateau in migraine prevalence of 11% for these participants.

“The linear decrease of migraine prevalence long before and the plateau long after type 2 diabetes diagnosis is novel and the association deserves to be studied in other populations,” Dr. Fagherazzi and his colleagues wrote. “The potential beneficial role of both hyperglycemia and hyperinsulinism on migraine occurrence needs to be further explored.”

The researchers noted limitations in the study, such as self-reported migraine by participants in the cohort, exclusion of non–pharmacologically treated T2DM cases, observational nature of the study, and homogenized population in the E3N cohort consisting of mainly women in menopause who were teachers and belonged to the same health insurance plan.

This study was funded by a grant from the French Research agency. The E3N cohort study was funded by the “Mutuelle Générale de l’Education Nationale,” European Community, French League against Cancer, Gustave Roussy, and French Institute of Health and Medical Research. Dr. Kurth is an advisory board member for CoLucid and has received funding for a research project from Amgen, honoraria from Lilly, lecture support from Novartis and Daiichi Sankyo, and travel support from the International Headache Society, as well as provided BMJ with editorial services.

SOURCE: Fagherazzi G et al. JAMA Neurol. 2018. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2018.3960.

SAN ANTONIO – Extending aromatase inhibitor (AI) therapy an additional 5 years reduces breast cancer recurrence risk, particularly in patients with node involvement, but the benefits vary based on prior treatment and must be weighed against the risk of bone fracture, according to findings from a meta-analysis involving more than 22,000 women.

The rate of any recurrence after 10 years in almost 7,500 women treated with 5 years of tamoxifen and then randomized to 5 additional years of AI treatment was reduced by 35%, compared with the rate in those who did not receive 5 additional years of AI therapy (recurrence rate, 10.7% vs. 7.1%, respectively; relative risk, 0.67), and the difference was “very highly significant,” Richard Gray, MD, reported at the San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium.

The distant recurrence rate and mortality rate were also significantly improved in those who received 5 years of AI therapy (rr, 0.77 for each), but the difference in mortality was of borderline significance, Dr. Gray, professor of medical statistics at the University of Oxford, London, reported on behalf of the Early Breast Cancer Trialists’ Collaborative Group.

However, in many of the trials included in the analysis, control group patients crossed over to the treatment group, which likely reduced the effect, he noted.

In about 12,000 women who were treated with 2-3 years of tamoxifen followed by 2-3 years of an AI and who were then randomized to an additional 3-5 years of AI therapy, the effects were less pronounced, with about a 20% reduced risk of any recurrence after 10 years vs. the rate in those without extended therapy (recurrence rate, 9.2% vs. 7.1%), he said.

The differences in the rates of distant recurrence and breast cancer mortality were not statistically significant in this group, but again, follow-up was short, he said.

Similarly, in about 3,300 women treated with an AI followed by an additional 5 years of AI therapy, recurrence risk was reduced by about 25% vs. the rate in those who did not receive extended therapy, and no difference was seen in the rates of distant recurrence or breast cancer mortality.

Of note, the benefits in those who received tamoxifen were seen immediately, whereas the benefits in those receiving AIs in the first 5 years emerged after about 2 years of extended therapy, Dr. Gray said, explaining that this was likely due to “carry-over benefits” of the earlier AI therapy.

The downside with extended AI therapy was a 25% increase in fracture risk, as well as bone pain, which can reduce quality of life.

Therefore, decisions about extended therapy should involve careful risk-benefit analyses, he said, adding that the findings of this meta-analysis of 12 trials, which included postmenopausal women – 99% of whom had estrogen receptor–positive disease – provide “the most reliable assessment of the available evidence ... [for] guiding decisions about endocrine therapy.”

In this video interview, he further discussed the details and limitations of the study, the effects of nodal status on outcomes, implications of the findings for clinical practice, the need for further follow-up on all of the studies included in the analysis, and plans for incorporating new data from the AERAS trial, which were also presented at the symposium and which complement and reinforce the current findings.

Dr. Gray reported having no disclosures.

SOURCE: Gray R et al., SABCS 2018: Abstract GS3-03.

SAN ANTONIO – Extending aromatase inhibitor (AI) therapy an additional 5 years reduces breast cancer recurrence risk, particularly in patients with node involvement, but the benefits vary based on prior treatment and must be weighed against the risk of bone fracture, according to findings from a meta-analysis involving more than 22,000 women.

The rate of any recurrence after 10 years in almost 7,500 women treated with 5 years of tamoxifen and then randomized to 5 additional years of AI treatment was reduced by 35%, compared with the rate in those who did not receive 5 additional years of AI therapy (recurrence rate, 10.7% vs. 7.1%, respectively; relative risk, 0.67), and the difference was “very highly significant,” Richard Gray, MD, reported at the San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium.

The distant recurrence rate and mortality rate were also significantly improved in those who received 5 years of AI therapy (rr, 0.77 for each), but the difference in mortality was of borderline significance, Dr. Gray, professor of medical statistics at the University of Oxford, London, reported on behalf of the Early Breast Cancer Trialists’ Collaborative Group.

However, in many of the trials included in the analysis, control group patients crossed over to the treatment group, which likely reduced the effect, he noted.

In about 12,000 women who were treated with 2-3 years of tamoxifen followed by 2-3 years of an AI and who were then randomized to an additional 3-5 years of AI therapy, the effects were less pronounced, with about a 20% reduced risk of any recurrence after 10 years vs. the rate in those without extended therapy (recurrence rate, 9.2% vs. 7.1%), he said.

The differences in the rates of distant recurrence and breast cancer mortality were not statistically significant in this group, but again, follow-up was short, he said.

Similarly, in about 3,300 women treated with an AI followed by an additional 5 years of AI therapy, recurrence risk was reduced by about 25% vs. the rate in those who did not receive extended therapy, and no difference was seen in the rates of distant recurrence or breast cancer mortality.

Of note, the benefits in those who received tamoxifen were seen immediately, whereas the benefits in those receiving AIs in the first 5 years emerged after about 2 years of extended therapy, Dr. Gray said, explaining that this was likely due to “carry-over benefits” of the earlier AI therapy.

The downside with extended AI therapy was a 25% increase in fracture risk, as well as bone pain, which can reduce quality of life.

Therefore, decisions about extended therapy should involve careful risk-benefit analyses, he said, adding that the findings of this meta-analysis of 12 trials, which included postmenopausal women – 99% of whom had estrogen receptor–positive disease – provide “the most reliable assessment of the available evidence ... [for] guiding decisions about endocrine therapy.”

In this video interview, he further discussed the details and limitations of the study, the effects of nodal status on outcomes, implications of the findings for clinical practice, the need for further follow-up on all of the studies included in the analysis, and plans for incorporating new data from the AERAS trial, which were also presented at the symposium and which complement and reinforce the current findings.

Dr. Gray reported having no disclosures.

SOURCE: Gray R et al., SABCS 2018: Abstract GS3-03.

SAN ANTONIO – Extending aromatase inhibitor (AI) therapy an additional 5 years reduces breast cancer recurrence risk, particularly in patients with node involvement, but the benefits vary based on prior treatment and must be weighed against the risk of bone fracture, according to findings from a meta-analysis involving more than 22,000 women.

The rate of any recurrence after 10 years in almost 7,500 women treated with 5 years of tamoxifen and then randomized to 5 additional years of AI treatment was reduced by 35%, compared with the rate in those who did not receive 5 additional years of AI therapy (recurrence rate, 10.7% vs. 7.1%, respectively; relative risk, 0.67), and the difference was “very highly significant,” Richard Gray, MD, reported at the San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium.

The distant recurrence rate and mortality rate were also significantly improved in those who received 5 years of AI therapy (rr, 0.77 for each), but the difference in mortality was of borderline significance, Dr. Gray, professor of medical statistics at the University of Oxford, London, reported on behalf of the Early Breast Cancer Trialists’ Collaborative Group.

However, in many of the trials included in the analysis, control group patients crossed over to the treatment group, which likely reduced the effect, he noted.

In about 12,000 women who were treated with 2-3 years of tamoxifen followed by 2-3 years of an AI and who were then randomized to an additional 3-5 years of AI therapy, the effects were less pronounced, with about a 20% reduced risk of any recurrence after 10 years vs. the rate in those without extended therapy (recurrence rate, 9.2% vs. 7.1%), he said.

The differences in the rates of distant recurrence and breast cancer mortality were not statistically significant in this group, but again, follow-up was short, he said.

Similarly, in about 3,300 women treated with an AI followed by an additional 5 years of AI therapy, recurrence risk was reduced by about 25% vs. the rate in those who did not receive extended therapy, and no difference was seen in the rates of distant recurrence or breast cancer mortality.

Of note, the benefits in those who received tamoxifen were seen immediately, whereas the benefits in those receiving AIs in the first 5 years emerged after about 2 years of extended therapy, Dr. Gray said, explaining that this was likely due to “carry-over benefits” of the earlier AI therapy.

The downside with extended AI therapy was a 25% increase in fracture risk, as well as bone pain, which can reduce quality of life.

Therefore, decisions about extended therapy should involve careful risk-benefit analyses, he said, adding that the findings of this meta-analysis of 12 trials, which included postmenopausal women – 99% of whom had estrogen receptor–positive disease – provide “the most reliable assessment of the available evidence ... [for] guiding decisions about endocrine therapy.”

In this video interview, he further discussed the details and limitations of the study, the effects of nodal status on outcomes, implications of the findings for clinical practice, the need for further follow-up on all of the studies included in the analysis, and plans for incorporating new data from the AERAS trial, which were also presented at the symposium and which complement and reinforce the current findings.

Dr. Gray reported having no disclosures.

SOURCE: Gray R et al., SABCS 2018: Abstract GS3-03.

SAN ANTONIO – Oxybutynin (Ditropan), a drug approved for the treatment of overactive bladder, provides a new option for managing hot flashes in women who can’t use estrogen because of a history of or concern about breast cancer, suggests a phase 3 double-blind randomized controlled trial.

Susan London/MDedge News

Managing hot flashes in breast cancer survivors is important for ensuring their adherence to endocrine therapy, as about a third fail to complete the recommended 5- to 7-year course, in part because of side effects, Roberto A. Leon-Ferre, MD, of the Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn., reported at the San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium

But many survivors cannot use estrogen because of hormone receptor–positive disease, and currently used nonhormonal alternatives have drawbacks. “Some of these agents interfere with the metabolic activation of tamoxifen, for example. There is also the association, unfortunately, of the taboo of taking antidepressants or anticonvulsants when you don’t have those diagnoses,” he said. In addition, a variety of nonpharmacologic options, such as black cohosh and vitamin E, have not proved any more effective than placebo.

The 150 women enrolled in the trial, ACCRU study SC-1603, were experiencing frequent, bothersome hot flashes and had a history of or concern about breast cancer. The 6-week reduction in a hot flash score capturing both frequency and severity was about 30% with placebo, 65% with oxybutynin 2.5 mg b.i.d., and 80% with oxybutynin 5 mg b.i.d. (P less than .01 across groups and for each dose vs. placebo), with a difference emerging within 2 weeks. “These doses are on the lower end of the currently used doses for urinary incontinence,” Dr. Leon-Ferre noted, with that range extending up to 20 mg daily.

The oxybutynin groups also had significantly greater reductions in hot flash frequency alone and improvements in measures of quality of life such as sleep, work, and relations. The drug was well tolerated, with expected main side effects of dry mouth and difficulty urinating.

Despite the potential pitfalls of cross-trial comparisons, the magnitude of benefit with oxybutynin appeared to exceed that previously reported with clonidine, fluoxetine, citalopram, venlafaxine, and pregabalin, according to Dr. Leon-Ferre.

“Oxybutynin significantly improves hot flash frequency and severity. The use of oxybutynin, more importantly, is associated with a positive impact in several quality of life metrics. And toxicity was acceptable,” he said. “While the two oxybutynin doses were not formally compared, 5 mg twice daily appears to be more effective.”
 

Treatment considerations

“What is your current strategy for using this variety of drugs?” asked SABCS codirector and press conference moderator C. Kent Osborne, MD, director of the Dan L. Duncan Cancer Center at Baylor College of Medicine, Houston. “Also, acupuncture has been shown to work in several randomized trials,” he noted.

Susan London/MDedge News

“Before this study, we had been primarily using citalopram or venlafaxine as our first drug intervention. We typically favored venlafaxine for patients who are taking tamoxifen due to the concern about interaction with the CYP2D6 inhibitors,” Dr. Leon-Ferre replied. Oxybutynin is an attractive alternative here because patients can stop it abruptly if they want, whereas venlafaxine may require a lengthy period of tapering and weaning.

His institution doesn’t have a structured acupuncture program. “We do have acupuncturists, but they have to follow a specific program, it’s not any acupuncture. But we often recommend that patients pursue it if they have access to it,” he explained. “With the results of this particular study, we have become more keen on using oxybutynin. As a matter of fact, many of the patients who enrolled in this study decided to continue [or start] it after it had been revealed whether they were taking it or the placebo.”

As with all therapies, it is important to match the therapy to the patient, Dr. Leon-Ferre cautioned. “I can tell you that we have been using oxybutynin, but one has to be cautious about which patients to select for this because this is an anticholinergic drug. We were very careful about not including patients who had taken other potent anticholinergic drugs because these medications can lead to confusion episodes and altered mental status, particularly in more elderly patients and patients who suffer from polypharmacy and take many medications that start interacting with each other.” Another contraindication is urinary retention.

It is also noteworthy that women in the trial received just 6 weeks of oxybutynin therapy, as there has been some concern that extended use of anticholinergics can lead to memory issues.

“With those caveats, I think that if we have an informed decision, we could prescribe oxybutynin to patients,” Dr. Leon-Ferre said. “But ideally, I would say try to use it for a shorter rather than longer period of time.”
 

Study details

The women randomized in ACCRU study SC-1603 had had hot flashes for at least 30 days and were experiencing at least 28 of them each week. Concurrent stable-dose antidepressants, gabapentin, and pregabalin were allowed, whereas concurrent potent anticholinergics were not. Two-thirds of the women were on tamoxifen or an aromatase inhibitor.

In addition to the dramatic reduction in hot flash scores seen with oxybutynin, the drug was associated with marked reductions in hot flash frequency: 30% with placebo versus 60% with oxybutynin 2.5 mg b.i.d. and 75% with oxybutynin 5 mg b.i.d. (P less than .01 across groups and for each dose compared with placebo), Dr. Leon-Ferre reported.

Most of the 10 domains on the Hot Flash-Related Daily Interference Scale were significantly more improved with both doses of oxybutynin relative to placebo. The exceptions were mood and life enjoyment, which were significantly more improved only with the higher dose, and concentration and sexuality, which were not significantly more improved with either dose.

Both doses of oxybutynin were overall well tolerated, according to Dr. Leon-Ferre. Each was associated with higher incidence of dry mouth, abdominal pain, and difficulty urinating relative to placebo, as expected from what is known about the drug. The higher dose had a greater incidence of dry eyes, episodes of confusion, diarrhea, and headache.

Dr. Leon-Ferre disclosed that he had no conflicts of interest. The study was funded by the Breast Cancer Research Foundation.

SOURCE: Leon-Ferre RA et al. SABCS 2018 Abstract GS6-02.

SAN ANTONIO – Oxybutynin (Ditropan), a drug approved for the treatment of overactive bladder, provides a new option for managing hot flashes in women who can’t use estrogen because of a history of or concern about breast cancer, suggests a phase 3 double-blind randomized controlled trial.

Susan London/MDedge News

Managing hot flashes in breast cancer survivors is important for ensuring their adherence to endocrine therapy, as about a third fail to complete the recommended 5- to 7-year course, in part because of side effects, Roberto A. Leon-Ferre, MD, of the Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn., reported at the San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium

But many survivors cannot use estrogen because of hormone receptor–positive disease, and currently used nonhormonal alternatives have drawbacks. “Some of these agents interfere with the metabolic activation of tamoxifen, for example. There is also the association, unfortunately, of the taboo of taking antidepressants or anticonvulsants when you don’t have those diagnoses,” he said. In addition, a variety of nonpharmacologic options, such as black cohosh and vitamin E, have not proved any more effective than placebo.

The 150 women enrolled in the trial, ACCRU study SC-1603, were experiencing frequent, bothersome hot flashes and had a history of or concern about breast cancer. The 6-week reduction in a hot flash score capturing both frequency and severity was about 30% with placebo, 65% with oxybutynin 2.5 mg b.i.d., and 80% with oxybutynin 5 mg b.i.d. (P less than .01 across groups and for each dose vs. placebo), with a difference emerging within 2 weeks. “These doses are on the lower end of the currently used doses for urinary incontinence,” Dr. Leon-Ferre noted, with that range extending up to 20 mg daily.

The oxybutynin groups also had significantly greater reductions in hot flash frequency alone and improvements in measures of quality of life such as sleep, work, and relations. The drug was well tolerated, with expected main side effects of dry mouth and difficulty urinating.

Despite the potential pitfalls of cross-trial comparisons, the magnitude of benefit with oxybutynin appeared to exceed that previously reported with clonidine, fluoxetine, citalopram, venlafaxine, and pregabalin, according to Dr. Leon-Ferre.

“Oxybutynin significantly improves hot flash frequency and severity. The use of oxybutynin, more importantly, is associated with a positive impact in several quality of life metrics. And toxicity was acceptable,” he said. “While the two oxybutynin doses were not formally compared, 5 mg twice daily appears to be more effective.”
 

Treatment considerations

“What is your current strategy for using this variety of drugs?” asked SABCS codirector and press conference moderator C. Kent Osborne, MD, director of the Dan L. Duncan Cancer Center at Baylor College of Medicine, Houston. “Also, acupuncture has been shown to work in several randomized trials,” he noted.

Susan London/MDedge News

“Before this study, we had been primarily using citalopram or venlafaxine as our first drug intervention. We typically favored venlafaxine for patients who are taking tamoxifen due to the concern about interaction with the CYP2D6 inhibitors,” Dr. Leon-Ferre replied. Oxybutynin is an attractive alternative here because patients can stop it abruptly if they want, whereas venlafaxine may require a lengthy period of tapering and weaning.

His institution doesn’t have a structured acupuncture program. “We do have acupuncturists, but they have to follow a specific program, it’s not any acupuncture. But we often recommend that patients pursue it if they have access to it,” he explained. “With the results of this particular study, we have become more keen on using oxybutynin. As a matter of fact, many of the patients who enrolled in this study decided to continue [or start] it after it had been revealed whether they were taking it or the placebo.”

As with all therapies, it is important to match the therapy to the patient, Dr. Leon-Ferre cautioned. “I can tell you that we have been using oxybutynin, but one has to be cautious about which patients to select for this because this is an anticholinergic drug. We were very careful about not including patients who had taken other potent anticholinergic drugs because these medications can lead to confusion episodes and altered mental status, particularly in more elderly patients and patients who suffer from polypharmacy and take many medications that start interacting with each other.” Another contraindication is urinary retention.

It is also noteworthy that women in the trial received just 6 weeks of oxybutynin therapy, as there has been some concern that extended use of anticholinergics can lead to memory issues.

“With those caveats, I think that if we have an informed decision, we could prescribe oxybutynin to patients,” Dr. Leon-Ferre said. “But ideally, I would say try to use it for a shorter rather than longer period of time.”
 

Study details

The women randomized in ACCRU study SC-1603 had had hot flashes for at least 30 days and were experiencing at least 28 of them each week. Concurrent stable-dose antidepressants, gabapentin, and pregabalin were allowed, whereas concurrent potent anticholinergics were not. Two-thirds of the women were on tamoxifen or an aromatase inhibitor.

In addition to the dramatic reduction in hot flash scores seen with oxybutynin, the drug was associated with marked reductions in hot flash frequency: 30% with placebo versus 60% with oxybutynin 2.5 mg b.i.d. and 75% with oxybutynin 5 mg b.i.d. (P less than .01 across groups and for each dose compared with placebo), Dr. Leon-Ferre reported.

Most of the 10 domains on the Hot Flash-Related Daily Interference Scale were significantly more improved with both doses of oxybutynin relative to placebo. The exceptions were mood and life enjoyment, which were significantly more improved only with the higher dose, and concentration and sexuality, which were not significantly more improved with either dose.

Both doses of oxybutynin were overall well tolerated, according to Dr. Leon-Ferre. Each was associated with higher incidence of dry mouth, abdominal pain, and difficulty urinating relative to placebo, as expected from what is known about the drug. The higher dose had a greater incidence of dry eyes, episodes of confusion, diarrhea, and headache.

Dr. Leon-Ferre disclosed that he had no conflicts of interest. The study was funded by the Breast Cancer Research Foundation.

SOURCE: Leon-Ferre RA et al. SABCS 2018 Abstract GS6-02.

SAN ANTONIO – Oxybutynin (Ditropan), a drug approved for the treatment of overactive bladder, provides a new option for managing hot flashes in women who can’t use estrogen because of a history of or concern about breast cancer, suggests a phase 3 double-blind randomized controlled trial.

Susan London/MDedge News

Managing hot flashes in breast cancer survivors is important for ensuring their adherence to endocrine therapy, as about a third fail to complete the recommended 5- to 7-year course, in part because of side effects, Roberto A. Leon-Ferre, MD, of the Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn., reported at the San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium

But many survivors cannot use estrogen because of hormone receptor–positive disease, and currently used nonhormonal alternatives have drawbacks. “Some of these agents interfere with the metabolic activation of tamoxifen, for example. There is also the association, unfortunately, of the taboo of taking antidepressants or anticonvulsants when you don’t have those diagnoses,” he said. In addition, a variety of nonpharmacologic options, such as black cohosh and vitamin E, have not proved any more effective than placebo.

The 150 women enrolled in the trial, ACCRU study SC-1603, were experiencing frequent, bothersome hot flashes and had a history of or concern about breast cancer. The 6-week reduction in a hot flash score capturing both frequency and severity was about 30% with placebo, 65% with oxybutynin 2.5 mg b.i.d., and 80% with oxybutynin 5 mg b.i.d. (P less than .01 across groups and for each dose vs. placebo), with a difference emerging within 2 weeks. “These doses are on the lower end of the currently used doses for urinary incontinence,” Dr. Leon-Ferre noted, with that range extending up to 20 mg daily.

The oxybutynin groups also had significantly greater reductions in hot flash frequency alone and improvements in measures of quality of life such as sleep, work, and relations. The drug was well tolerated, with expected main side effects of dry mouth and difficulty urinating.

Despite the potential pitfalls of cross-trial comparisons, the magnitude of benefit with oxybutynin appeared to exceed that previously reported with clonidine, fluoxetine, citalopram, venlafaxine, and pregabalin, according to Dr. Leon-Ferre.

“Oxybutynin significantly improves hot flash frequency and severity. The use of oxybutynin, more importantly, is associated with a positive impact in several quality of life metrics. And toxicity was acceptable,” he said. “While the two oxybutynin doses were not formally compared, 5 mg twice daily appears to be more effective.”
 

Treatment considerations

“What is your current strategy for using this variety of drugs?” asked SABCS codirector and press conference moderator C. Kent Osborne, MD, director of the Dan L. Duncan Cancer Center at Baylor College of Medicine, Houston. “Also, acupuncture has been shown to work in several randomized trials,” he noted.

Susan London/MDedge News

“Before this study, we had been primarily using citalopram or venlafaxine as our first drug intervention. We typically favored venlafaxine for patients who are taking tamoxifen due to the concern about interaction with the CYP2D6 inhibitors,” Dr. Leon-Ferre replied. Oxybutynin is an attractive alternative here because patients can stop it abruptly if they want, whereas venlafaxine may require a lengthy period of tapering and weaning.

His institution doesn’t have a structured acupuncture program. “We do have acupuncturists, but they have to follow a specific program, it’s not any acupuncture. But we often recommend that patients pursue it if they have access to it,” he explained. “With the results of this particular study, we have become more keen on using oxybutynin. As a matter of fact, many of the patients who enrolled in this study decided to continue [or start] it after it had been revealed whether they were taking it or the placebo.”

As with all therapies, it is important to match the therapy to the patient, Dr. Leon-Ferre cautioned. “I can tell you that we have been using oxybutynin, but one has to be cautious about which patients to select for this because this is an anticholinergic drug. We were very careful about not including patients who had taken other potent anticholinergic drugs because these medications can lead to confusion episodes and altered mental status, particularly in more elderly patients and patients who suffer from polypharmacy and take many medications that start interacting with each other.” Another contraindication is urinary retention.

It is also noteworthy that women in the trial received just 6 weeks of oxybutynin therapy, as there has been some concern that extended use of anticholinergics can lead to memory issues.

“With those caveats, I think that if we have an informed decision, we could prescribe oxybutynin to patients,” Dr. Leon-Ferre said. “But ideally, I would say try to use it for a shorter rather than longer period of time.”
 

Study details

The women randomized in ACCRU study SC-1603 had had hot flashes for at least 30 days and were experiencing at least 28 of them each week. Concurrent stable-dose antidepressants, gabapentin, and pregabalin were allowed, whereas concurrent potent anticholinergics were not. Two-thirds of the women were on tamoxifen or an aromatase inhibitor.

In addition to the dramatic reduction in hot flash scores seen with oxybutynin, the drug was associated with marked reductions in hot flash frequency: 30% with placebo versus 60% with oxybutynin 2.5 mg b.i.d. and 75% with oxybutynin 5 mg b.i.d. (P less than .01 across groups and for each dose compared with placebo), Dr. Leon-Ferre reported.

Most of the 10 domains on the Hot Flash-Related Daily Interference Scale were significantly more improved with both doses of oxybutynin relative to placebo. The exceptions were mood and life enjoyment, which were significantly more improved only with the higher dose, and concentration and sexuality, which were not significantly more improved with either dose.

Both doses of oxybutynin were overall well tolerated, according to Dr. Leon-Ferre. Each was associated with higher incidence of dry mouth, abdominal pain, and difficulty urinating relative to placebo, as expected from what is known about the drug. The higher dose had a greater incidence of dry eyes, episodes of confusion, diarrhea, and headache.

Dr. Leon-Ferre disclosed that he had no conflicts of interest. The study was funded by the Breast Cancer Research Foundation.

SOURCE: Leon-Ferre RA et al. SABCS 2018 Abstract GS6-02.

A significant number of patients who receive only a placebo in a clinical trial of cancer immunotherapy still experience grade three or grade four adverse events, research suggests.

Writing in JAMA Network Open, researchers reported the outcomes of a systematic review and meta-analysis of 10 randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trials of targeted therapy or immunotherapy drugs for cancer, in which patients in the placebo group were treated only with placebo and no other anticancer drugs.

Among the 4,873 patients who were randomized to placebo, a mean of 85.1% experienced some sort of placebo adverse event. The overall incidence of grade 3-4 placebo adverse events was 18% but was as high as 25% in two trials – one in renal cell carcinoma and one in melanoma – and as low as 11% in one trial.

Hypertension was the most frequent grade 3-4 adverse event among patients on placebo, experienced by a mean of 2.8% of patients, followed by fatigue (1%) and diarrhea (0.8%).

Neither route of administration nor cancer type made a significant difference in terms of the rate of placebo adverse events. No deaths attributed to the placebo were reported, but the mean rate of discontinuation due to placebo adverse events was 3.9%, and was higher than 5% for four trials.

The median duration of placebo administration ranged from 10 to 15 months for all but one study, and the authors noted that the longer the placebo exposure, the higher the proportion of grade 3-4 adverse events.

The investigators – Matías Rodrigo Chacón, MD, and his colleagues in the research department at the Argentine Association of Clinical Oncology – said that studies with a lower incidence of grade 3-4 adverse events in the treatment arm also had a lower incidence of grade 3-4 placebo adverse events, while the higher incidences of placebo adverse events were seen in studies that also had a higher incidence of treatment-related adverse events.

They suggested that “contextual factors,” such as the information given during the informed consent process, could contribute to negative expectations of adverse events.

“To illustrate this point, in an RCT [randomized controlled trial] of aspirin as a treatment for unstable angina, a higher incidence of gastrointestinal irritation was reported in centers that specified its potential occurrence in the informed consent compared with research units that did not include that risk,” they wrote.

They also suggested that patients may experience anxiety associated with the uncertainty about whether they had received active treatment or placebo, and this could also affect their distress levels.

No conflicts of interest were declared.

SOURCE: Chacón M et al. JAMA Network Open. 2018 Dec 7. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.5617.

A significant number of patients who receive only a placebo in a clinical trial of cancer immunotherapy still experience grade three or grade four adverse events, research suggests.

Writing in JAMA Network Open, researchers reported the outcomes of a systematic review and meta-analysis of 10 randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trials of targeted therapy or immunotherapy drugs for cancer, in which patients in the placebo group were treated only with placebo and no other anticancer drugs.

Among the 4,873 patients who were randomized to placebo, a mean of 85.1% experienced some sort of placebo adverse event. The overall incidence of grade 3-4 placebo adverse events was 18% but was as high as 25% in two trials – one in renal cell carcinoma and one in melanoma – and as low as 11% in one trial.

Hypertension was the most frequent grade 3-4 adverse event among patients on placebo, experienced by a mean of 2.8% of patients, followed by fatigue (1%) and diarrhea (0.8%).

Neither route of administration nor cancer type made a significant difference in terms of the rate of placebo adverse events. No deaths attributed to the placebo were reported, but the mean rate of discontinuation due to placebo adverse events was 3.9%, and was higher than 5% for four trials.

The median duration of placebo administration ranged from 10 to 15 months for all but one study, and the authors noted that the longer the placebo exposure, the higher the proportion of grade 3-4 adverse events.

The investigators – Matías Rodrigo Chacón, MD, and his colleagues in the research department at the Argentine Association of Clinical Oncology – said that studies with a lower incidence of grade 3-4 adverse events in the treatment arm also had a lower incidence of grade 3-4 placebo adverse events, while the higher incidences of placebo adverse events were seen in studies that also had a higher incidence of treatment-related adverse events.

They suggested that “contextual factors,” such as the information given during the informed consent process, could contribute to negative expectations of adverse events.

“To illustrate this point, in an RCT [randomized controlled trial] of aspirin as a treatment for unstable angina, a higher incidence of gastrointestinal irritation was reported in centers that specified its potential occurrence in the informed consent compared with research units that did not include that risk,” they wrote.

They also suggested that patients may experience anxiety associated with the uncertainty about whether they had received active treatment or placebo, and this could also affect their distress levels.

No conflicts of interest were declared.

SOURCE: Chacón M et al. JAMA Network Open. 2018 Dec 7. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.5617.

A significant number of patients who receive only a placebo in a clinical trial of cancer immunotherapy still experience grade three or grade four adverse events, research suggests.

Writing in JAMA Network Open, researchers reported the outcomes of a systematic review and meta-analysis of 10 randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trials of targeted therapy or immunotherapy drugs for cancer, in which patients in the placebo group were treated only with placebo and no other anticancer drugs.

Among the 4,873 patients who were randomized to placebo, a mean of 85.1% experienced some sort of placebo adverse event. The overall incidence of grade 3-4 placebo adverse events was 18% but was as high as 25% in two trials – one in renal cell carcinoma and one in melanoma – and as low as 11% in one trial.

Hypertension was the most frequent grade 3-4 adverse event among patients on placebo, experienced by a mean of 2.8% of patients, followed by fatigue (1%) and diarrhea (0.8%).

Neither route of administration nor cancer type made a significant difference in terms of the rate of placebo adverse events. No deaths attributed to the placebo were reported, but the mean rate of discontinuation due to placebo adverse events was 3.9%, and was higher than 5% for four trials.

The median duration of placebo administration ranged from 10 to 15 months for all but one study, and the authors noted that the longer the placebo exposure, the higher the proportion of grade 3-4 adverse events.

The investigators – Matías Rodrigo Chacón, MD, and his colleagues in the research department at the Argentine Association of Clinical Oncology – said that studies with a lower incidence of grade 3-4 adverse events in the treatment arm also had a lower incidence of grade 3-4 placebo adverse events, while the higher incidences of placebo adverse events were seen in studies that also had a higher incidence of treatment-related adverse events.

They suggested that “contextual factors,” such as the information given during the informed consent process, could contribute to negative expectations of adverse events.

“To illustrate this point, in an RCT [randomized controlled trial] of aspirin as a treatment for unstable angina, a higher incidence of gastrointestinal irritation was reported in centers that specified its potential occurrence in the informed consent compared with research units that did not include that risk,” they wrote.

They also suggested that patients may experience anxiety associated with the uncertainty about whether they had received active treatment or placebo, and this could also affect their distress levels.

No conflicts of interest were declared.

SOURCE: Chacón M et al. JAMA Network Open. 2018 Dec 7. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.5617.

BERLIN – Real-world data from six postmarketing surveillance studies suggest that currently available disease-modifying treatments (DMTs) for relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) have long-lasting effects that are matched by reasonable tolerability.

solitude72/iStockphoto

Long-term efficacy and safety data on natalizumab (Tysabri), fingolimod (Gilenya), alemtuzumab (Lemtrada), dimethyl fumarate (Tecfidera), and teriflunomide (Aubagio) from four Swedish studies, one French study, and one international study were reported during a poster session on long-term treatment monitoring at the annual congress of the European Committee for Treatment and Research in Multiple Sclerosis (ECTRIMS).
 

The IMSE 1 study with natalizumab

The Immunomodulation and Multiple Sclerosis Epidemiology (IMSE) studies are Swedish postmarketing surveillance studies that were started with the launch of various DMTs in Sweden: natalizumab since 2006 (IMSE 1), fingolimod in 2015 (IMSE 2), alemtuzumab in 2014 (IMSE 3), and dimethyl fumarate in 2014 (IMSE 5).

“Postmarketing surveillance is important for determination of long-term safety and effectiveness in a real-world setting,” Stina Kågström and her associates observed in their poster reporting some findings of the IMSE 1 study with natalizumab (Mult Scler. 2018;24[S2]:699-700, Abstract P1232).

Ms. Kågström of the department of clinical neuroscience at the Karolinska Institute in Stockholm and her colleagues reported that data on 3,108 patients who were seen at 54 Swedish clinics had been collated via the nationwide Swedish Quality Registry for Neurological Care (NEUROreg). NEUROreg started out as an MS register but has since widened its remit to include other neurologic diagnoses.

For the IMSE 1 study, prospectively recorded data regarding natalizumab treatment, adverse events, JC-virus (JCV) status and clinical effectiveness measures were obtained from NEUROreg for 2,225 women and 883 men. Just over one-third (37%, n = 1,150) were still receiving natalizumab at the time of the analysis.


The mean age at which natalizumab was started was 39 years, with treatment primarily given for RRMS (81% of patients) and less often for secondary progressive multiple sclerosis (SPMS, 15%) and rarely for other types of progressive MS. The mean treatment duration was just under 4 years (47.6 months).

JCV testing was introduced in 2011 in Sweden, and this “has led to fewer treated JCV-positive patients,” the IMSE 1 study investigators reported. “This likely explains a reduced incidence of PML [progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy],” they suggested. There were nine PML cases diagnosed in Sweden from 2008 to the data cut-off point in 2018, one of which was fatal.

JCV status from 2011 onward was available for 1,269 patients, of whom 39% were JCV positive and 61% were JCV negative. The overall drug survival rate was 72% for JCV-negative and 14% for JCV-positive patients. Improved health status was seen, as measured by the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS), the Multiple Sclerosis Severity Score (MSSS), and the physical and psychological Multiple Sclerosis Impact Scale–29 (MSIS-29) components.

A total of 644 of 1,269 patients discontinued treatment with natalizumab at some point, of whom 67% discontinued because of being JCV positive. The main reason for discontinuation in JCV-negative patients was pregnancy or planning a pregnancy (38%), with lack of effect (10%) and adverse events (11%) as other key reasons for stopping natalizumab.

Ms. Kågström and her associates concluded that natalizumab was “generally well tolerated with sustained effectiveness.”

The IMSE 2 study with fingolimod

Data on the long-term safety and efficacy of fingolimod were reported from the IMSE 2 study (Mult Scler. 2018;24[S2]:696-7, Abstract P1228). Lead author Anna Fält, also of the Karolinska Institute, and her associates analyzed data for 1,634 patients who had been treated with fingolimod from June 2015 to September 2018.

Most patients were older than 30 years (79%), and those aged 30 and older were predominantly female (69%), had an RRMS diagnosis (88%), and been treated for a mean of about 3 years (37 months). A total of 829 were being treated with fingolimod at the time of the analysis, with 844 having discontinued treatment at some point. The main reason for discontinuing treatment with fingolimod was a lack of effect (42% of cases) or an adverse effect (34%). The IMSE 2 study authors reported in their abstract that most patients were switched to rituximab after discontinuing fingolimod.

The number of relapses per 1,000 patient-years was reduced by fingolimod treatment from 280 to 82, comparing before and during treatment for all age groups studied. Relapse rate dropped from 694 per 1,000 patient-years before treatment to 138 during treatment in patients aged 20 years or younger, from 454 to 122 in those aged 21-30 years, and from 257 to 72 in those older than 31 years.

After 1 year of treatment, improvements were seen in the health status of patients as measured by various scales, including the EDSS, MSSS, MSIS-29 Physical, and MSIS-29 Psychological. When the researchers analyzed data by age groups, significant improvements were seen in patients aged 21-30 years and older than 30 years.

Ninety nonserious and 62 serious adverse events were reported in fingolimod-treated patients during the time of analysis. Of the latter, 13 serious adverse events involved cardiac disorders, 12 neoplasms, and 10 infections and infestations.

Overall, the IMSE 2 study investigators said that fingolimod was generally tolerable and reduced disease activity in MS.
 

French experience with fingolimod: The VIRGILE study

Real-world data on the long-term safety and efficacy of fingolimod in France from the VIRGILE study were reported by Christine Lebrun-Frenay, MD, PhD, and her associates (Mult Scler. 2018;24[S2]:698-9, Abstract P1231).

Dr. Lebrun-Frenay of Pasteur 2 Hospital in Nice and her coauthors noted that VIRGILE study included patients starting treatment with fingolimod between January 2014 and February 2016. A total of 1,047 patients were included, and another 330 patients treated with natalizumab were included at the behest of the French health authorities.

The annualized relapse rate after 2 years of follow-up was 0.30 in the fingolimod group. Dr. Lebrun-Frenay and her colleagues noted: “The 3-year data from this interim analysis provide evidence for sustained efficacy of fingolimod.” Indeed, they report that almost 60% of patients did not relapse and 64% had no worsening of disease. On average, EDSS was stable during the 3-year follow-up period.

“Safety and tolerability profiles of fingolimod were in line with previous clinical experience, with lymphopenia being the most frequent AE [adverse event] reported,” they added.
 

The IMSE 3 study with alemtuzumab

Long-term experience with alemtuzumab as a treatment for RRMS in the real-world setting is more limited as it only became available for use for this indication in 2014, but some insight is provided by the results of the IMSE 3 study (Mult Scler. 2018;24[S2]:706-7, Abstract P1240).

In total, there were 113 patients treated with alemtuzumab; the vast majority (94%) had RRMS and were aged a mean of 34 years at the start of treatment. Treatment was for more than 12 months in 101 patients, more than 24 months in 86 patients, and more than 36 months in 36 patients.

“In patients treated for at least 12 months, significant improvements were seen in several clinical parameters,” Dr. Fält and her associates observed in their poster at ECTRIMS. The mean baseline and 12-month values for the EDSS were 2.0 and 1.6, and for the MSSS they were 3.46 and 2.61. The mean baseline and 12-month values for the MSIS-29 Psychological subscale were 35.1 and 30.8, respectively, and for MSIS-29 Physical they were 22.7 and 17.7.

Overall, there were 14 nonserious and 11 serious adverse events, the most common of which were infections and infestations, metabolism and nutrition disorders, and immune system disorders.

“A longer follow-up period is needed to assess the real-world effectiveness and safety of alemtuzumab,” the IMSE 3 study authors noted.
 

The IMSE 5 study with dimethyl fumarate

Similarly, the authors of the IMSE 5 study (Mult Scler. 2018;24[S2]:701-2, Abstract 1234) concluded that a longer follow-up period is need to assess the real-world effectiveness of dimethyl fumarate. Selin Safer Demirbüker, also of the Karolinska Institute, and her associates looked at data on 2,108 patients treated with dimethyl fumarate between March 2014 and April 2018, of whom 1,150 were still receiving treatment at the time of their assessment.

The mean age of patients at the start of treatment was 41 years, 91% had RRMS, and 73% were female. The mean treatment duration was 22.3 months. The majority of patients (n = 867) had been previously treated with interferon and glatiramer acetate (Copaxone) prior to dimethyl fumarate, with 538 being naive to treatment.

“Dimethyl fumarate seems to have a positive effect for patients remaining on treatment,” wrote Ms. Safer Demirbüker and her colleagues. The overall 1-year drug survival reported in their abstract was 74%. Their poster showed a lower 2-year drug survival rate of 63.5% for men and 56.4% for women.

“Swedish patients show cognitive, psychological, and physical benefits after 2 or more years of treatment,” the IMSE 5 study authors further noted. Mean EDSS, MSSS, and MSIS-29 Psychological values all fell from baseline to 2 years.

Overall, 958 (47%) of patients discontinued treatment with dimethyl fumarate at some point, primarily (in 52% of cases) because of adverse events or lack of effect (29% of cases). Most patients (39%) switched to rituximab (15% had no new treatment registered), but 35% of patients continued treatment for 3 or more years.

Twelve-year follow-up of teriflunomide shows continued efficacy, safety

Mark Freedman, MD, of the University of Ottawa and the Ottawa Hospital Research Institute and his associates reported long-term follow-up data on the efficacy and safety of teriflunomide (Aubagio) in relapsing forms of MS (Mult Scler. 2018;24[S2]:700-1, Abstract P1233). After up to 12 years’ follow up, teriflunomide 14 mg was associated with an overall annualized relapse rate of 0.228.

Yearly annualized relapse rates were “low and stable,” Dr. Freedman and his coauthors from the United States, Spain, Italy, France, Germany, England, the Republic of Korea, and Australia noted in their poster.

“As of August 2018, over 93,000 patients were being treated with teriflunomide,” the authors stated. This represented a real-world exposure of approximately 186,000 patient-years up to December 2017, they added.

For the analysis, data from one phase 2 study and three phase 3 studies (TEMSO, TOWER, and TENERE) and their long-term extension studies were pooled. In all, there were 1,696 patients treated with 14 mg of teriflunomide in these studies.

Annualized relapse rates ranged from 0.321 in the first year of follow-up in the studies to 0.080 by the 12th year. The proportions of patients remaining relapse free “were high and stable (ranging from 0.75 in year 1 to 0.93 in years 8 and 9).” EDSS scores were 2.57 at baseline and 2.27 at year 12.

Importantly, no new safety signals were reported, Dr. Freedman and his colleagues wrote, adding that most adverse events were mild to moderate in severity.

Taken together, “these data demonstrate the long-term efficacy and safety of teriflunomide,” they concluded.
 

Study and author disclosures

The teriflunomide analysis was supported by Sanofi. Dr. Freedman disclosed receiving research or educational grant support from Bayer and Genzyme; honoraria/consulting fees from Bayer, Biogen, EMD Canada, Novartis, Sanofi, and Teva; and membership on company advisory boards/boards of directors/other similar groups for Bayer, Biogen, Chugai, Merck Serono, Novartis, Opexa Therapeutics, Sanofi, and Teva.

The IMSE 1 and 5 studies were supported by Biogen and the IMSE 2 and 3 studies by Novartis. The lead study authors for the IMSE studies – Dr. Kågström, Dr. Fält, and Dr. Safer Demirbüker – had nothing personal to disclose. Other authors included employees of the sponsoring companies or those who had received research funding or honoraria for consultancy work from the companies.

The VIRGILE study was supported by Novartis Pharma AG, Switzerland. Dr. Lebrun-Frenay disclosed receiving consultancy fees from Merck, Novartis, Biogen, MedDay, Roche, Teva, and Genzyme. Coauthors included Novartis employees.

BERLIN – Real-world data from six postmarketing surveillance studies suggest that currently available disease-modifying treatments (DMTs) for relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) have long-lasting effects that are matched by reasonable tolerability.

solitude72/iStockphoto

Long-term efficacy and safety data on natalizumab (Tysabri), fingolimod (Gilenya), alemtuzumab (Lemtrada), dimethyl fumarate (Tecfidera), and teriflunomide (Aubagio) from four Swedish studies, one French study, and one international study were reported during a poster session on long-term treatment monitoring at the annual congress of the European Committee for Treatment and Research in Multiple Sclerosis (ECTRIMS).
 

The IMSE 1 study with natalizumab

The Immunomodulation and Multiple Sclerosis Epidemiology (IMSE) studies are Swedish postmarketing surveillance studies that were started with the launch of various DMTs in Sweden: natalizumab since 2006 (IMSE 1), fingolimod in 2015 (IMSE 2), alemtuzumab in 2014 (IMSE 3), and dimethyl fumarate in 2014 (IMSE 5).

“Postmarketing surveillance is important for determination of long-term safety and effectiveness in a real-world setting,” Stina Kågström and her associates observed in their poster reporting some findings of the IMSE 1 study with natalizumab (Mult Scler. 2018;24[S2]:699-700, Abstract P1232).

Ms. Kågström of the department of clinical neuroscience at the Karolinska Institute in Stockholm and her colleagues reported that data on 3,108 patients who were seen at 54 Swedish clinics had been collated via the nationwide Swedish Quality Registry for Neurological Care (NEUROreg). NEUROreg started out as an MS register but has since widened its remit to include other neurologic diagnoses.

For the IMSE 1 study, prospectively recorded data regarding natalizumab treatment, adverse events, JC-virus (JCV) status and clinical effectiveness measures were obtained from NEUROreg for 2,225 women and 883 men. Just over one-third (37%, n = 1,150) were still receiving natalizumab at the time of the analysis.


The mean age at which natalizumab was started was 39 years, with treatment primarily given for RRMS (81% of patients) and less often for secondary progressive multiple sclerosis (SPMS, 15%) and rarely for other types of progressive MS. The mean treatment duration was just under 4 years (47.6 months).

JCV testing was introduced in 2011 in Sweden, and this “has led to fewer treated JCV-positive patients,” the IMSE 1 study investigators reported. “This likely explains a reduced incidence of PML [progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy],” they suggested. There were nine PML cases diagnosed in Sweden from 2008 to the data cut-off point in 2018, one of which was fatal.

JCV status from 2011 onward was available for 1,269 patients, of whom 39% were JCV positive and 61% were JCV negative. The overall drug survival rate was 72% for JCV-negative and 14% for JCV-positive patients. Improved health status was seen, as measured by the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS), the Multiple Sclerosis Severity Score (MSSS), and the physical and psychological Multiple Sclerosis Impact Scale–29 (MSIS-29) components.

A total of 644 of 1,269 patients discontinued treatment with natalizumab at some point, of whom 67% discontinued because of being JCV positive. The main reason for discontinuation in JCV-negative patients was pregnancy or planning a pregnancy (38%), with lack of effect (10%) and adverse events (11%) as other key reasons for stopping natalizumab.

Ms. Kågström and her associates concluded that natalizumab was “generally well tolerated with sustained effectiveness.”

The IMSE 2 study with fingolimod

Data on the long-term safety and efficacy of fingolimod were reported from the IMSE 2 study (Mult Scler. 2018;24[S2]:696-7, Abstract P1228). Lead author Anna Fält, also of the Karolinska Institute, and her associates analyzed data for 1,634 patients who had been treated with fingolimod from June 2015 to September 2018.

Most patients were older than 30 years (79%), and those aged 30 and older were predominantly female (69%), had an RRMS diagnosis (88%), and been treated for a mean of about 3 years (37 months). A total of 829 were being treated with fingolimod at the time of the analysis, with 844 having discontinued treatment at some point. The main reason for discontinuing treatment with fingolimod was a lack of effect (42% of cases) or an adverse effect (34%). The IMSE 2 study authors reported in their abstract that most patients were switched to rituximab after discontinuing fingolimod.

The number of relapses per 1,000 patient-years was reduced by fingolimod treatment from 280 to 82, comparing before and during treatment for all age groups studied. Relapse rate dropped from 694 per 1,000 patient-years before treatment to 138 during treatment in patients aged 20 years or younger, from 454 to 122 in those aged 21-30 years, and from 257 to 72 in those older than 31 years.

After 1 year of treatment, improvements were seen in the health status of patients as measured by various scales, including the EDSS, MSSS, MSIS-29 Physical, and MSIS-29 Psychological. When the researchers analyzed data by age groups, significant improvements were seen in patients aged 21-30 years and older than 30 years.

Ninety nonserious and 62 serious adverse events were reported in fingolimod-treated patients during the time of analysis. Of the latter, 13 serious adverse events involved cardiac disorders, 12 neoplasms, and 10 infections and infestations.

Overall, the IMSE 2 study investigators said that fingolimod was generally tolerable and reduced disease activity in MS.
 

French experience with fingolimod: The VIRGILE study

Real-world data on the long-term safety and efficacy of fingolimod in France from the VIRGILE study were reported by Christine Lebrun-Frenay, MD, PhD, and her associates (Mult Scler. 2018;24[S2]:698-9, Abstract P1231).

Dr. Lebrun-Frenay of Pasteur 2 Hospital in Nice and her coauthors noted that VIRGILE study included patients starting treatment with fingolimod between January 2014 and February 2016. A total of 1,047 patients were included, and another 330 patients treated with natalizumab were included at the behest of the French health authorities.

The annualized relapse rate after 2 years of follow-up was 0.30 in the fingolimod group. Dr. Lebrun-Frenay and her colleagues noted: “The 3-year data from this interim analysis provide evidence for sustained efficacy of fingolimod.” Indeed, they report that almost 60% of patients did not relapse and 64% had no worsening of disease. On average, EDSS was stable during the 3-year follow-up period.

“Safety and tolerability profiles of fingolimod were in line with previous clinical experience, with lymphopenia being the most frequent AE [adverse event] reported,” they added.
 

The IMSE 3 study with alemtuzumab

Long-term experience with alemtuzumab as a treatment for RRMS in the real-world setting is more limited as it only became available for use for this indication in 2014, but some insight is provided by the results of the IMSE 3 study (Mult Scler. 2018;24[S2]:706-7, Abstract P1240).

In total, there were 113 patients treated with alemtuzumab; the vast majority (94%) had RRMS and were aged a mean of 34 years at the start of treatment. Treatment was for more than 12 months in 101 patients, more than 24 months in 86 patients, and more than 36 months in 36 patients.

“In patients treated for at least 12 months, significant improvements were seen in several clinical parameters,” Dr. Fält and her associates observed in their poster at ECTRIMS. The mean baseline and 12-month values for the EDSS were 2.0 and 1.6, and for the MSSS they were 3.46 and 2.61. The mean baseline and 12-month values for the MSIS-29 Psychological subscale were 35.1 and 30.8, respectively, and for MSIS-29 Physical they were 22.7 and 17.7.

Overall, there were 14 nonserious and 11 serious adverse events, the most common of which were infections and infestations, metabolism and nutrition disorders, and immune system disorders.

“A longer follow-up period is needed to assess the real-world effectiveness and safety of alemtuzumab,” the IMSE 3 study authors noted.
 

The IMSE 5 study with dimethyl fumarate

Similarly, the authors of the IMSE 5 study (Mult Scler. 2018;24[S2]:701-2, Abstract 1234) concluded that a longer follow-up period is need to assess the real-world effectiveness of dimethyl fumarate. Selin Safer Demirbüker, also of the Karolinska Institute, and her associates looked at data on 2,108 patients treated with dimethyl fumarate between March 2014 and April 2018, of whom 1,150 were still receiving treatment at the time of their assessment.

The mean age of patients at the start of treatment was 41 years, 91% had RRMS, and 73% were female. The mean treatment duration was 22.3 months. The majority of patients (n = 867) had been previously treated with interferon and glatiramer acetate (Copaxone) prior to dimethyl fumarate, with 538 being naive to treatment.

“Dimethyl fumarate seems to have a positive effect for patients remaining on treatment,” wrote Ms. Safer Demirbüker and her colleagues. The overall 1-year drug survival reported in their abstract was 74%. Their poster showed a lower 2-year drug survival rate of 63.5% for men and 56.4% for women.

“Swedish patients show cognitive, psychological, and physical benefits after 2 or more years of treatment,” the IMSE 5 study authors further noted. Mean EDSS, MSSS, and MSIS-29 Psychological values all fell from baseline to 2 years.

Overall, 958 (47%) of patients discontinued treatment with dimethyl fumarate at some point, primarily (in 52% of cases) because of adverse events or lack of effect (29% of cases). Most patients (39%) switched to rituximab (15% had no new treatment registered), but 35% of patients continued treatment for 3 or more years.

Twelve-year follow-up of teriflunomide shows continued efficacy, safety

Mark Freedman, MD, of the University of Ottawa and the Ottawa Hospital Research Institute and his associates reported long-term follow-up data on the efficacy and safety of teriflunomide (Aubagio) in relapsing forms of MS (Mult Scler. 2018;24[S2]:700-1, Abstract P1233). After up to 12 years’ follow up, teriflunomide 14 mg was associated with an overall annualized relapse rate of 0.228.

Yearly annualized relapse rates were “low and stable,” Dr. Freedman and his coauthors from the United States, Spain, Italy, France, Germany, England, the Republic of Korea, and Australia noted in their poster.

“As of August 2018, over 93,000 patients were being treated with teriflunomide,” the authors stated. This represented a real-world exposure of approximately 186,000 patient-years up to December 2017, they added.

For the analysis, data from one phase 2 study and three phase 3 studies (TEMSO, TOWER, and TENERE) and their long-term extension studies were pooled. In all, there were 1,696 patients treated with 14 mg of teriflunomide in these studies.

Annualized relapse rates ranged from 0.321 in the first year of follow-up in the studies to 0.080 by the 12th year. The proportions of patients remaining relapse free “were high and stable (ranging from 0.75 in year 1 to 0.93 in years 8 and 9).” EDSS scores were 2.57 at baseline and 2.27 at year 12.

Importantly, no new safety signals were reported, Dr. Freedman and his colleagues wrote, adding that most adverse events were mild to moderate in severity.

Taken together, “these data demonstrate the long-term efficacy and safety of teriflunomide,” they concluded.
 

Study and author disclosures

The teriflunomide analysis was supported by Sanofi. Dr. Freedman disclosed receiving research or educational grant support from Bayer and Genzyme; honoraria/consulting fees from Bayer, Biogen, EMD Canada, Novartis, Sanofi, and Teva; and membership on company advisory boards/boards of directors/other similar groups for Bayer, Biogen, Chugai, Merck Serono, Novartis, Opexa Therapeutics, Sanofi, and Teva.

The IMSE 1 and 5 studies were supported by Biogen and the IMSE 2 and 3 studies by Novartis. The lead study authors for the IMSE studies – Dr. Kågström, Dr. Fält, and Dr. Safer Demirbüker – had nothing personal to disclose. Other authors included employees of the sponsoring companies or those who had received research funding or honoraria for consultancy work from the companies.

The VIRGILE study was supported by Novartis Pharma AG, Switzerland. Dr. Lebrun-Frenay disclosed receiving consultancy fees from Merck, Novartis, Biogen, MedDay, Roche, Teva, and Genzyme. Coauthors included Novartis employees.

BERLIN – Real-world data from six postmarketing surveillance studies suggest that currently available disease-modifying treatments (DMTs) for relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) have long-lasting effects that are matched by reasonable tolerability.

solitude72/iStockphoto

Long-term efficacy and safety data on natalizumab (Tysabri), fingolimod (Gilenya), alemtuzumab (Lemtrada), dimethyl fumarate (Tecfidera), and teriflunomide (Aubagio) from four Swedish studies, one French study, and one international study were reported during a poster session on long-term treatment monitoring at the annual congress of the European Committee for Treatment and Research in Multiple Sclerosis (ECTRIMS).
 

The IMSE 1 study with natalizumab

The Immunomodulation and Multiple Sclerosis Epidemiology (IMSE) studies are Swedish postmarketing surveillance studies that were started with the launch of various DMTs in Sweden: natalizumab since 2006 (IMSE 1), fingolimod in 2015 (IMSE 2), alemtuzumab in 2014 (IMSE 3), and dimethyl fumarate in 2014 (IMSE 5).

“Postmarketing surveillance is important for determination of long-term safety and effectiveness in a real-world setting,” Stina Kågström and her associates observed in their poster reporting some findings of the IMSE 1 study with natalizumab (Mult Scler. 2018;24[S2]:699-700, Abstract P1232).

Ms. Kågström of the department of clinical neuroscience at the Karolinska Institute in Stockholm and her colleagues reported that data on 3,108 patients who were seen at 54 Swedish clinics had been collated via the nationwide Swedish Quality Registry for Neurological Care (NEUROreg). NEUROreg started out as an MS register but has since widened its remit to include other neurologic diagnoses.

For the IMSE 1 study, prospectively recorded data regarding natalizumab treatment, adverse events, JC-virus (JCV) status and clinical effectiveness measures were obtained from NEUROreg for 2,225 women and 883 men. Just over one-third (37%, n = 1,150) were still receiving natalizumab at the time of the analysis.


The mean age at which natalizumab was started was 39 years, with treatment primarily given for RRMS (81% of patients) and less often for secondary progressive multiple sclerosis (SPMS, 15%) and rarely for other types of progressive MS. The mean treatment duration was just under 4 years (47.6 months).

JCV testing was introduced in 2011 in Sweden, and this “has led to fewer treated JCV-positive patients,” the IMSE 1 study investigators reported. “This likely explains a reduced incidence of PML [progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy],” they suggested. There were nine PML cases diagnosed in Sweden from 2008 to the data cut-off point in 2018, one of which was fatal.

JCV status from 2011 onward was available for 1,269 patients, of whom 39% were JCV positive and 61% were JCV negative. The overall drug survival rate was 72% for JCV-negative and 14% for JCV-positive patients. Improved health status was seen, as measured by the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS), the Multiple Sclerosis Severity Score (MSSS), and the physical and psychological Multiple Sclerosis Impact Scale–29 (MSIS-29) components.

A total of 644 of 1,269 patients discontinued treatment with natalizumab at some point, of whom 67% discontinued because of being JCV positive. The main reason for discontinuation in JCV-negative patients was pregnancy or planning a pregnancy (38%), with lack of effect (10%) and adverse events (11%) as other key reasons for stopping natalizumab.

Ms. Kågström and her associates concluded that natalizumab was “generally well tolerated with sustained effectiveness.”

The IMSE 2 study with fingolimod

Data on the long-term safety and efficacy of fingolimod were reported from the IMSE 2 study (Mult Scler. 2018;24[S2]:696-7, Abstract P1228). Lead author Anna Fält, also of the Karolinska Institute, and her associates analyzed data for 1,634 patients who had been treated with fingolimod from June 2015 to September 2018.

Most patients were older than 30 years (79%), and those aged 30 and older were predominantly female (69%), had an RRMS diagnosis (88%), and been treated for a mean of about 3 years (37 months). A total of 829 were being treated with fingolimod at the time of the analysis, with 844 having discontinued treatment at some point. The main reason for discontinuing treatment with fingolimod was a lack of effect (42% of cases) or an adverse effect (34%). The IMSE 2 study authors reported in their abstract that most patients were switched to rituximab after discontinuing fingolimod.

The number of relapses per 1,000 patient-years was reduced by fingolimod treatment from 280 to 82, comparing before and during treatment for all age groups studied. Relapse rate dropped from 694 per 1,000 patient-years before treatment to 138 during treatment in patients aged 20 years or younger, from 454 to 122 in those aged 21-30 years, and from 257 to 72 in those older than 31 years.

After 1 year of treatment, improvements were seen in the health status of patients as measured by various scales, including the EDSS, MSSS, MSIS-29 Physical, and MSIS-29 Psychological. When the researchers analyzed data by age groups, significant improvements were seen in patients aged 21-30 years and older than 30 years.

Ninety nonserious and 62 serious adverse events were reported in fingolimod-treated patients during the time of analysis. Of the latter, 13 serious adverse events involved cardiac disorders, 12 neoplasms, and 10 infections and infestations.

Overall, the IMSE 2 study investigators said that fingolimod was generally tolerable and reduced disease activity in MS.
 

French experience with fingolimod: The VIRGILE study

Real-world data on the long-term safety and efficacy of fingolimod in France from the VIRGILE study were reported by Christine Lebrun-Frenay, MD, PhD, and her associates (Mult Scler. 2018;24[S2]:698-9, Abstract P1231).

Dr. Lebrun-Frenay of Pasteur 2 Hospital in Nice and her coauthors noted that VIRGILE study included patients starting treatment with fingolimod between January 2014 and February 2016. A total of 1,047 patients were included, and another 330 patients treated with natalizumab were included at the behest of the French health authorities.

The annualized relapse rate after 2 years of follow-up was 0.30 in the fingolimod group. Dr. Lebrun-Frenay and her colleagues noted: “The 3-year data from this interim analysis provide evidence for sustained efficacy of fingolimod.” Indeed, they report that almost 60% of patients did not relapse and 64% had no worsening of disease. On average, EDSS was stable during the 3-year follow-up period.

“Safety and tolerability profiles of fingolimod were in line with previous clinical experience, with lymphopenia being the most frequent AE [adverse event] reported,” they added.
 

The IMSE 3 study with alemtuzumab

Long-term experience with alemtuzumab as a treatment for RRMS in the real-world setting is more limited as it only became available for use for this indication in 2014, but some insight is provided by the results of the IMSE 3 study (Mult Scler. 2018;24[S2]:706-7, Abstract P1240).

In total, there were 113 patients treated with alemtuzumab; the vast majority (94%) had RRMS and were aged a mean of 34 years at the start of treatment. Treatment was for more than 12 months in 101 patients, more than 24 months in 86 patients, and more than 36 months in 36 patients.

“In patients treated for at least 12 months, significant improvements were seen in several clinical parameters,” Dr. Fält and her associates observed in their poster at ECTRIMS. The mean baseline and 12-month values for the EDSS were 2.0 and 1.6, and for the MSSS they were 3.46 and 2.61. The mean baseline and 12-month values for the MSIS-29 Psychological subscale were 35.1 and 30.8, respectively, and for MSIS-29 Physical they were 22.7 and 17.7.

Overall, there were 14 nonserious and 11 serious adverse events, the most common of which were infections and infestations, metabolism and nutrition disorders, and immune system disorders.

“A longer follow-up period is needed to assess the real-world effectiveness and safety of alemtuzumab,” the IMSE 3 study authors noted.
 

The IMSE 5 study with dimethyl fumarate

Similarly, the authors of the IMSE 5 study (Mult Scler. 2018;24[S2]:701-2, Abstract 1234) concluded that a longer follow-up period is need to assess the real-world effectiveness of dimethyl fumarate. Selin Safer Demirbüker, also of the Karolinska Institute, and her associates looked at data on 2,108 patients treated with dimethyl fumarate between March 2014 and April 2018, of whom 1,150 were still receiving treatment at the time of their assessment.

The mean age of patients at the start of treatment was 41 years, 91% had RRMS, and 73% were female. The mean treatment duration was 22.3 months. The majority of patients (n = 867) had been previously treated with interferon and glatiramer acetate (Copaxone) prior to dimethyl fumarate, with 538 being naive to treatment.

“Dimethyl fumarate seems to have a positive effect for patients remaining on treatment,” wrote Ms. Safer Demirbüker and her colleagues. The overall 1-year drug survival reported in their abstract was 74%. Their poster showed a lower 2-year drug survival rate of 63.5% for men and 56.4% for women.

“Swedish patients show cognitive, psychological, and physical benefits after 2 or more years of treatment,” the IMSE 5 study authors further noted. Mean EDSS, MSSS, and MSIS-29 Psychological values all fell from baseline to 2 years.

Overall, 958 (47%) of patients discontinued treatment with dimethyl fumarate at some point, primarily (in 52% of cases) because of adverse events or lack of effect (29% of cases). Most patients (39%) switched to rituximab (15% had no new treatment registered), but 35% of patients continued treatment for 3 or more years.

Twelve-year follow-up of teriflunomide shows continued efficacy, safety

Mark Freedman, MD, of the University of Ottawa and the Ottawa Hospital Research Institute and his associates reported long-term follow-up data on the efficacy and safety of teriflunomide (Aubagio) in relapsing forms of MS (Mult Scler. 2018;24[S2]:700-1, Abstract P1233). After up to 12 years’ follow up, teriflunomide 14 mg was associated with an overall annualized relapse rate of 0.228.

Yearly annualized relapse rates were “low and stable,” Dr. Freedman and his coauthors from the United States, Spain, Italy, France, Germany, England, the Republic of Korea, and Australia noted in their poster.

“As of August 2018, over 93,000 patients were being treated with teriflunomide,” the authors stated. This represented a real-world exposure of approximately 186,000 patient-years up to December 2017, they added.

For the analysis, data from one phase 2 study and three phase 3 studies (TEMSO, TOWER, and TENERE) and their long-term extension studies were pooled. In all, there were 1,696 patients treated with 14 mg of teriflunomide in these studies.

Annualized relapse rates ranged from 0.321 in the first year of follow-up in the studies to 0.080 by the 12th year. The proportions of patients remaining relapse free “were high and stable (ranging from 0.75 in year 1 to 0.93 in years 8 and 9).” EDSS scores were 2.57 at baseline and 2.27 at year 12.

Importantly, no new safety signals were reported, Dr. Freedman and his colleagues wrote, adding that most adverse events were mild to moderate in severity.

Taken together, “these data demonstrate the long-term efficacy and safety of teriflunomide,” they concluded.
 

Study and author disclosures

The teriflunomide analysis was supported by Sanofi. Dr. Freedman disclosed receiving research or educational grant support from Bayer and Genzyme; honoraria/consulting fees from Bayer, Biogen, EMD Canada, Novartis, Sanofi, and Teva; and membership on company advisory boards/boards of directors/other similar groups for Bayer, Biogen, Chugai, Merck Serono, Novartis, Opexa Therapeutics, Sanofi, and Teva.

The IMSE 1 and 5 studies were supported by Biogen and the IMSE 2 and 3 studies by Novartis. The lead study authors for the IMSE studies – Dr. Kågström, Dr. Fält, and Dr. Safer Demirbüker – had nothing personal to disclose. Other authors included employees of the sponsoring companies or those who had received research funding or honoraria for consultancy work from the companies.

The VIRGILE study was supported by Novartis Pharma AG, Switzerland. Dr. Lebrun-Frenay disclosed receiving consultancy fees from Merck, Novartis, Biogen, MedDay, Roche, Teva, and Genzyme. Coauthors included Novartis employees.

Around one-half of women and one-third of men will develop dementia, stroke, or parkinsonism during their lifetime, according to a study published online ahead of print October 2 in the Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry.

The population-based Rotterdam study involved 12,102 individuals (57.7% women) who were ages 45 or older and free of neurologic disease at baseline. This cohort was followed for 26 years. Silvan Licher, a PhD student in the Department of Epidemiology at Erasmus MC University Medical Center Rotterdam in the Netherlands, and colleagues found that a 45-year-old woman had a 48.2% overall remaining lifetime risk of developing dementia, stroke, or parkinsonism, while a 45-year-old man had a 36.3% lifetime risk.

—Bianca Nogrady

Suggested Reading

Licher S, Darweesh SKL, Wolters FJ, et al. Lifetime risk of common neurological diseases in the elderly population. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2018 Oct 2 [Epub ahead of print].

Around one-half of women and one-third of men will develop dementia, stroke, or parkinsonism during their lifetime, according to a study published online ahead of print October 2 in the Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry.

The population-based Rotterdam study involved 12,102 individuals (57.7% women) who were ages 45 or older and free of neurologic disease at baseline. This cohort was followed for 26 years. Silvan Licher, a PhD student in the Department of Epidemiology at Erasmus MC University Medical Center Rotterdam in the Netherlands, and colleagues found that a 45-year-old woman had a 48.2% overall remaining lifetime risk of developing dementia, stroke, or parkinsonism, while a 45-year-old man had a 36.3% lifetime risk.

—Bianca Nogrady

Suggested Reading

Licher S, Darweesh SKL, Wolters FJ, et al. Lifetime risk of common neurological diseases in the elderly population. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2018 Oct 2 [Epub ahead of print].

Around one-half of women and one-third of men will develop dementia, stroke, or parkinsonism during their lifetime, according to a study published online ahead of print October 2 in the Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry.

The population-based Rotterdam study involved 12,102 individuals (57.7% women) who were ages 45 or older and free of neurologic disease at baseline. This cohort was followed for 26 years. Silvan Licher, a PhD student in the Department of Epidemiology at Erasmus MC University Medical Center Rotterdam in the Netherlands, and colleagues found that a 45-year-old woman had a 48.2% overall remaining lifetime risk of developing dementia, stroke, or parkinsonism, while a 45-year-old man had a 36.3% lifetime risk.

—Bianca Nogrady

Suggested Reading

Licher S, Darweesh SKL, Wolters FJ, et al. Lifetime risk of common neurological diseases in the elderly population. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2018 Oct 2 [Epub ahead of print].

SAN ANTONIO – Partial-breast irradiation misses the statistical bar for being as efficacious as whole-breast irradiation in treating residual disease after lumpectomy, but absolute differences in long-term outcomes are minuscule, suggests a phase 3, randomized, controlled trial conducted by NRG Oncology.

MDedge/Susan London

At a median follow-up of 10.2 years, the trial was unable to refute the hypothesis that the partial technique was inferior in terms of ipsilateral breast tumor recurrences; however, the difference between techniques in this outcome was an absolute 0.7%, lead investigator Frank Vicini, MD, principal investigator at the MHP Radiation Oncology Institute/21st Century Oncology in Pontiac, Mich., reported in a session and press conference at the San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium. The difference in recurrence-free interval was significant but likewise small, at 1.6%, and other efficacy outcomes were similar.

Meanwhile, the groups had low, statistically indistinguishable rates of grade 3-5 toxicities and second cancers. The investigators are still analyzing quality of life and cosmesis outcomes.

“This was the largest trial ever looking at partial-breast [irradiation] in a very diverse group of patients. Even though we weren’t able to demonstrate equivalence, it’s nice to see that in this large population of patients with extended follow-up, the differences are quite small,” Dr. Vicini said. “Because the differences for both ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence and recurrence-free interval were very small, partial-breast irradiation may be an acceptable alternative to whole-breast irradiation for a proportion of women who are undergoing breast-conserving surgery.”
 

Implications for practice and research

SABCS codirector and press conference moderator Virginia Kaklamani, MD, leader of the breast cancer program at UT Health San Antonio, asked how the findings have influenced his practice.

“This trial is over 15 years old now, and a lot of these techniques have been refined. But we are offering partial-breast irradiation to our patients,” Dr. Vicini replied. “There are a lot of competing ways to do radiation now; probably the biggest competing way is to do 3 weeks of whole-breast irradiation. But for those patients who have transportation issues and more elderly patients, we try to offer partial-breast irradiation, within the guidelines of ASTRO [American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology].”

Some of the women enrolled had risk factors that fall outside those guidelines, for example, higher-grade tumors or axillary node involvement, he acknowledged. “We tried to do exploratory analyses to look at whether certain patients did better with whole-breast irradiation or not, and we weren’t able to really pick out any group of patients that had better or worse outcome based on those criteria,” he said. “We have yet to look at the quality indices for radiation therapy, in other words, how much the breast actually needs to be treated. But at the present time, I would just suggest sticking with the ASTRO guidelines.”

It is noteworthy that likely the most important endpoints, disease-free and overall survival, did not differ between groups, according to Dr. Vicini. “Certainly, a recurrence is still an important event for a patient, so our goal is to always limit that as much as possible,” he said. “But putting it into perspective, does a 0.7% higher risk of recurrence [matter] when you know the survival rates are the same? That’s what patients and doctors need to take into consideration. This is a pretty dramatic difference in treatment [duration], 6 weeks, down to 1 week or less. There have been many studies looking at quality of life and, as you can imagine, quality of life is better” with the shorter therapy.

The trial’s results can also inform statistical planning of future trials, according to Dr. Kaklamani. “It’s important when we design the trials to look at clinically meaningful differences because we don’t want to harm our patients, but at the same time, we are also harming them by giving them more treatment. So if you are designing a trial where a 0.7% difference is statistically significant, you probably would have been able to get away with many fewer patients and a difference of 1.5% or 2% not being significant, and I think everybody would be happy with that.”
 

Study details

Dr. Vicini and colleagues enrolled in their trial 4,216 women with stage 0-II breast cancer who had undergone lumpectomy. They were randomized to whole-breast irradiation (5-6 weeks of radiation therapy at that time) or partial-breast irradiation using one of three techniques (3D conformal external beam radiation completed in 5 days, interstitial brachytherapy completed in 5 days, or device-based brachytherapy).

The hazard ratio for ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (invasive or DCIS) as a first recurrence with partial-breast irradiation versus whole-breast irradiation was 1.22, with the upper bound of the 90% confidence interval (0.94-1.58) falling just outside the predefined range to declare the two modalities equivalent (0.667-1.5), Dr. Vicini reported. However, the absolute difference in the 10-year cumulative incidence of ipsilateral breast tumor recurrences was merely 0.7% (4.6% vs. 3.9%).

The 10-year recurrence-free interval was inferior with partial-breast irradiation (hazard ratio, 1.33; P = .02), but the absolute difference was again small at 1.6% (91.8% vs 93.4%). The partial- and whole-breast irradiation groups were statistically indistinguishable on distant disease-free interval (96.7% vs 97.1%; HR, 1.31; P = .15) and overall survival (90.6% vs. 91.3%; HR, 1.10; P = .35).

Dr. Vicini disclosed that he is a research advisor for ImpediMed. The study was sponsored by the National Cancer Institute.

SOURCE: Vicini FA et al. SABCS 2018, Abstract GS4-04,

SAN ANTONIO – Partial-breast irradiation misses the statistical bar for being as efficacious as whole-breast irradiation in treating residual disease after lumpectomy, but absolute differences in long-term outcomes are minuscule, suggests a phase 3, randomized, controlled trial conducted by NRG Oncology.

MDedge/Susan London

At a median follow-up of 10.2 years, the trial was unable to refute the hypothesis that the partial technique was inferior in terms of ipsilateral breast tumor recurrences; however, the difference between techniques in this outcome was an absolute 0.7%, lead investigator Frank Vicini, MD, principal investigator at the MHP Radiation Oncology Institute/21st Century Oncology in Pontiac, Mich., reported in a session and press conference at the San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium. The difference in recurrence-free interval was significant but likewise small, at 1.6%, and other efficacy outcomes were similar.

Meanwhile, the groups had low, statistically indistinguishable rates of grade 3-5 toxicities and second cancers. The investigators are still analyzing quality of life and cosmesis outcomes.

“This was the largest trial ever looking at partial-breast [irradiation] in a very diverse group of patients. Even though we weren’t able to demonstrate equivalence, it’s nice to see that in this large population of patients with extended follow-up, the differences are quite small,” Dr. Vicini said. “Because the differences for both ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence and recurrence-free interval were very small, partial-breast irradiation may be an acceptable alternative to whole-breast irradiation for a proportion of women who are undergoing breast-conserving surgery.”
 

Implications for practice and research

SABCS codirector and press conference moderator Virginia Kaklamani, MD, leader of the breast cancer program at UT Health San Antonio, asked how the findings have influenced his practice.

“This trial is over 15 years old now, and a lot of these techniques have been refined. But we are offering partial-breast irradiation to our patients,” Dr. Vicini replied. “There are a lot of competing ways to do radiation now; probably the biggest competing way is to do 3 weeks of whole-breast irradiation. But for those patients who have transportation issues and more elderly patients, we try to offer partial-breast irradiation, within the guidelines of ASTRO [American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology].”

Some of the women enrolled had risk factors that fall outside those guidelines, for example, higher-grade tumors or axillary node involvement, he acknowledged. “We tried to do exploratory analyses to look at whether certain patients did better with whole-breast irradiation or not, and we weren’t able to really pick out any group of patients that had better or worse outcome based on those criteria,” he said. “We have yet to look at the quality indices for radiation therapy, in other words, how much the breast actually needs to be treated. But at the present time, I would just suggest sticking with the ASTRO guidelines.”

It is noteworthy that likely the most important endpoints, disease-free and overall survival, did not differ between groups, according to Dr. Vicini. “Certainly, a recurrence is still an important event for a patient, so our goal is to always limit that as much as possible,” he said. “But putting it into perspective, does a 0.7% higher risk of recurrence [matter] when you know the survival rates are the same? That’s what patients and doctors need to take into consideration. This is a pretty dramatic difference in treatment [duration], 6 weeks, down to 1 week or less. There have been many studies looking at quality of life and, as you can imagine, quality of life is better” with the shorter therapy.

The trial’s results can also inform statistical planning of future trials, according to Dr. Kaklamani. “It’s important when we design the trials to look at clinically meaningful differences because we don’t want to harm our patients, but at the same time, we are also harming them by giving them more treatment. So if you are designing a trial where a 0.7% difference is statistically significant, you probably would have been able to get away with many fewer patients and a difference of 1.5% or 2% not being significant, and I think everybody would be happy with that.”
 

Study details

Dr. Vicini and colleagues enrolled in their trial 4,216 women with stage 0-II breast cancer who had undergone lumpectomy. They were randomized to whole-breast irradiation (5-6 weeks of radiation therapy at that time) or partial-breast irradiation using one of three techniques (3D conformal external beam radiation completed in 5 days, interstitial brachytherapy completed in 5 days, or device-based brachytherapy).

The hazard ratio for ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (invasive or DCIS) as a first recurrence with partial-breast irradiation versus whole-breast irradiation was 1.22, with the upper bound of the 90% confidence interval (0.94-1.58) falling just outside the predefined range to declare the two modalities equivalent (0.667-1.5), Dr. Vicini reported. However, the absolute difference in the 10-year cumulative incidence of ipsilateral breast tumor recurrences was merely 0.7% (4.6% vs. 3.9%).

The 10-year recurrence-free interval was inferior with partial-breast irradiation (hazard ratio, 1.33; P = .02), but the absolute difference was again small at 1.6% (91.8% vs 93.4%). The partial- and whole-breast irradiation groups were statistically indistinguishable on distant disease-free interval (96.7% vs 97.1%; HR, 1.31; P = .15) and overall survival (90.6% vs. 91.3%; HR, 1.10; P = .35).

Dr. Vicini disclosed that he is a research advisor for ImpediMed. The study was sponsored by the National Cancer Institute.

SOURCE: Vicini FA et al. SABCS 2018, Abstract GS4-04,

SAN ANTONIO – Partial-breast irradiation misses the statistical bar for being as efficacious as whole-breast irradiation in treating residual disease after lumpectomy, but absolute differences in long-term outcomes are minuscule, suggests a phase 3, randomized, controlled trial conducted by NRG Oncology.

MDedge/Susan London

At a median follow-up of 10.2 years, the trial was unable to refute the hypothesis that the partial technique was inferior in terms of ipsilateral breast tumor recurrences; however, the difference between techniques in this outcome was an absolute 0.7%, lead investigator Frank Vicini, MD, principal investigator at the MHP Radiation Oncology Institute/21st Century Oncology in Pontiac, Mich., reported in a session and press conference at the San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium. The difference in recurrence-free interval was significant but likewise small, at 1.6%, and other efficacy outcomes were similar.

Meanwhile, the groups had low, statistically indistinguishable rates of grade 3-5 toxicities and second cancers. The investigators are still analyzing quality of life and cosmesis outcomes.

“This was the largest trial ever looking at partial-breast [irradiation] in a very diverse group of patients. Even though we weren’t able to demonstrate equivalence, it’s nice to see that in this large population of patients with extended follow-up, the differences are quite small,” Dr. Vicini said. “Because the differences for both ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence and recurrence-free interval were very small, partial-breast irradiation may be an acceptable alternative to whole-breast irradiation for a proportion of women who are undergoing breast-conserving surgery.”
 

Implications for practice and research

SABCS codirector and press conference moderator Virginia Kaklamani, MD, leader of the breast cancer program at UT Health San Antonio, asked how the findings have influenced his practice.

“This trial is over 15 years old now, and a lot of these techniques have been refined. But we are offering partial-breast irradiation to our patients,” Dr. Vicini replied. “There are a lot of competing ways to do radiation now; probably the biggest competing way is to do 3 weeks of whole-breast irradiation. But for those patients who have transportation issues and more elderly patients, we try to offer partial-breast irradiation, within the guidelines of ASTRO [American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology].”

Some of the women enrolled had risk factors that fall outside those guidelines, for example, higher-grade tumors or axillary node involvement, he acknowledged. “We tried to do exploratory analyses to look at whether certain patients did better with whole-breast irradiation or not, and we weren’t able to really pick out any group of patients that had better or worse outcome based on those criteria,” he said. “We have yet to look at the quality indices for radiation therapy, in other words, how much the breast actually needs to be treated. But at the present time, I would just suggest sticking with the ASTRO guidelines.”

It is noteworthy that likely the most important endpoints, disease-free and overall survival, did not differ between groups, according to Dr. Vicini. “Certainly, a recurrence is still an important event for a patient, so our goal is to always limit that as much as possible,” he said. “But putting it into perspective, does a 0.7% higher risk of recurrence [matter] when you know the survival rates are the same? That’s what patients and doctors need to take into consideration. This is a pretty dramatic difference in treatment [duration], 6 weeks, down to 1 week or less. There have been many studies looking at quality of life and, as you can imagine, quality of life is better” with the shorter therapy.

The trial’s results can also inform statistical planning of future trials, according to Dr. Kaklamani. “It’s important when we design the trials to look at clinically meaningful differences because we don’t want to harm our patients, but at the same time, we are also harming them by giving them more treatment. So if you are designing a trial where a 0.7% difference is statistically significant, you probably would have been able to get away with many fewer patients and a difference of 1.5% or 2% not being significant, and I think everybody would be happy with that.”
 

Study details

Dr. Vicini and colleagues enrolled in their trial 4,216 women with stage 0-II breast cancer who had undergone lumpectomy. They were randomized to whole-breast irradiation (5-6 weeks of radiation therapy at that time) or partial-breast irradiation using one of three techniques (3D conformal external beam radiation completed in 5 days, interstitial brachytherapy completed in 5 days, or device-based brachytherapy).

The hazard ratio for ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (invasive or DCIS) as a first recurrence with partial-breast irradiation versus whole-breast irradiation was 1.22, with the upper bound of the 90% confidence interval (0.94-1.58) falling just outside the predefined range to declare the two modalities equivalent (0.667-1.5), Dr. Vicini reported. However, the absolute difference in the 10-year cumulative incidence of ipsilateral breast tumor recurrences was merely 0.7% (4.6% vs. 3.9%).

The 10-year recurrence-free interval was inferior with partial-breast irradiation (hazard ratio, 1.33; P = .02), but the absolute difference was again small at 1.6% (91.8% vs 93.4%). The partial- and whole-breast irradiation groups were statistically indistinguishable on distant disease-free interval (96.7% vs 97.1%; HR, 1.31; P = .15) and overall survival (90.6% vs. 91.3%; HR, 1.10; P = .35).

Dr. Vicini disclosed that he is a research advisor for ImpediMed. The study was sponsored by the National Cancer Institute.

SOURCE: Vicini FA et al. SABCS 2018, Abstract GS4-04,

SAN ANTONIO – Circulating tumor cell (CTC) counts could serve as a standalone biomarker for determining which patients with newly diagnosed estrogen receptor–positive, HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer are at high risk and should receive first-line chemotherapy and which are at low risk and could safely receive upfront hormonal therapy.

In the phase 3 STIC CTC trial, there were no significant differences in the primary endpoint of progression-free survival (PFS) or a secondary endpoint of overall survival (OS) between patients whose treatments were assigned according to the clinicians’ judgment and those whose treatments were chosen based on CTC count, reported Francois-Clement Bidard, MD, PhD, from Institut Curie in St. Cloud, France.

“CTC count should or may be included in the decision algorithm for hormone receptor–positive, HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer patients,” he said at the San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium.

The CTC investigators sought to compare CTC-driven clinical decisions with the clinicians choice for first-line therapy in 778 patients with hormone receptor–positive, HER2-negative breast cancer.

Patients were stratified by performance status (0-3), treatment center, and disease-free interval and were randomly assigned to receive therapy based on either the clinician’s judgment of the best course of therapy for each patient or to CTC count, with a cutoff of less than 5 CTC/7.5 mL indicating hormonal therapy and 5 CTC/7.5 mL or above indicating higher-risk disease requiring chemotherapy. In the clinician’s choice arm, the CTC reading was recorded but not implemented, and in the CTC arm, the clinician’s choice was dismissed.

The trial protocol did not specify a chemotherapy regimen, and patients initially assigned to chemotherapy were allowed to have maintenance hormonal therapy.

At 42 months of follow-up, median PFS in the CTC arm was 15.6 months, compared with 14.0 months in the clinician choice arm. The hazard ratio for PFS was 0.92 (90% confidence interval, 0.80-1.06), and the trial met its primary noninferiority endpoint with a prespecified noninferiority margin of 1.25.

The OS rate at 24 months in the CTC group was 82.1%, and in the clinician choice arm was 81.4% (nonsignificant).

Planned subgroup analyses in which the two decision methods were in agreement on whether a patient was at either low or high risk found no significant differences in either PFS or OS, showing that the CTC count complemented the prognostic estimate and isolated patients with either excellent or poor outcomes.


However, when the clinician rated the risk as low but the CTC count rated it as high (196 patients), PFS was significantly higher with CTC (HR, 0.62; P = .002). OS did not differ in this circumstance.

In an exploratory analysis combining all patients with discordant findings (clinician low/CTC high or vice versa), the investigators determined that chemotherapy would offer a significant advantage for both PFS (HR, 0.66; adjusted P = .001) and OS (HR, 0.65; adjusted P = .04).

Virginia Kaklamani, MD, leader of the breast cancer program at the University of Texas, San Antonio, who moderated a briefing where Dr. Bidard discussed the findings prior to presentation in a general session, said that she is not fully convinced that CTC counts can substitute for the clinician’s discretion. “I would probably want to see another study or some more data.”

She noted that for the patient population in this study clinicians today often prescribe cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) 4/6 inhibitors in the first-line setting over conventional chemotherapy.

“But it is true that CDK 4/6 inhibitors, besides their cost, $10,000 a month, also are toxic to our patients. They cause neutropenias, increase infections, some diarrhea, so if there is a group I can potentially save from taking a CDK 4/6 inhibitor in the first-line setting I’d love to do that. In the metastatic setting what we’re trying to do for years is deescalate therapy, so the idea of giving chemotherapy instead of endocrine therapy is a little foreign to us,” Dr. Kaklamani said.

The strength of the study, however, is that it’s the first to show a survival benefit using CTCs as a diagnostic aid, she added.

Lisa A. Carey, MD, from the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, who was not involved in the study, said in an interview that the technology is promising, but not ready for prime time.

“To be honest, it didn’t appear to me that it helped very much, so that particular approach I don’t think is likely to have much benefit for patients. But the concept is an excellent one, and I do think that’s something we need to take home, that this is an area of an unmet need,” she said.

The study was funded by the National Cancer Institute of France, Institut Curie, and Menarini. Dr. Bidard reported receiving research funding and travel grants from Menarini. Dr. Kaklamani and Dr. Carey reported having no relevant conflicts of interest.

SOURCE: Bidard F-C et al. SABCS 2018, Abstract GS3-07.

SAN ANTONIO – Circulating tumor cell (CTC) counts could serve as a standalone biomarker for determining which patients with newly diagnosed estrogen receptor–positive, HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer are at high risk and should receive first-line chemotherapy and which are at low risk and could safely receive upfront hormonal therapy.

In the phase 3 STIC CTC trial, there were no significant differences in the primary endpoint of progression-free survival (PFS) or a secondary endpoint of overall survival (OS) between patients whose treatments were assigned according to the clinicians’ judgment and those whose treatments were chosen based on CTC count, reported Francois-Clement Bidard, MD, PhD, from Institut Curie in St. Cloud, France.

“CTC count should or may be included in the decision algorithm for hormone receptor–positive, HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer patients,” he said at the San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium.

The CTC investigators sought to compare CTC-driven clinical decisions with the clinicians choice for first-line therapy in 778 patients with hormone receptor–positive, HER2-negative breast cancer.

Patients were stratified by performance status (0-3), treatment center, and disease-free interval and were randomly assigned to receive therapy based on either the clinician’s judgment of the best course of therapy for each patient or to CTC count, with a cutoff of less than 5 CTC/7.5 mL indicating hormonal therapy and 5 CTC/7.5 mL or above indicating higher-risk disease requiring chemotherapy. In the clinician’s choice arm, the CTC reading was recorded but not implemented, and in the CTC arm, the clinician’s choice was dismissed.

The trial protocol did not specify a chemotherapy regimen, and patients initially assigned to chemotherapy were allowed to have maintenance hormonal therapy.

At 42 months of follow-up, median PFS in the CTC arm was 15.6 months, compared with 14.0 months in the clinician choice arm. The hazard ratio for PFS was 0.92 (90% confidence interval, 0.80-1.06), and the trial met its primary noninferiority endpoint with a prespecified noninferiority margin of 1.25.

The OS rate at 24 months in the CTC group was 82.1%, and in the clinician choice arm was 81.4% (nonsignificant).

Planned subgroup analyses in which the two decision methods were in agreement on whether a patient was at either low or high risk found no significant differences in either PFS or OS, showing that the CTC count complemented the prognostic estimate and isolated patients with either excellent or poor outcomes.


However, when the clinician rated the risk as low but the CTC count rated it as high (196 patients), PFS was significantly higher with CTC (HR, 0.62; P = .002). OS did not differ in this circumstance.

In an exploratory analysis combining all patients with discordant findings (clinician low/CTC high or vice versa), the investigators determined that chemotherapy would offer a significant advantage for both PFS (HR, 0.66; adjusted P = .001) and OS (HR, 0.65; adjusted P = .04).

Virginia Kaklamani, MD, leader of the breast cancer program at the University of Texas, San Antonio, who moderated a briefing where Dr. Bidard discussed the findings prior to presentation in a general session, said that she is not fully convinced that CTC counts can substitute for the clinician’s discretion. “I would probably want to see another study or some more data.”

She noted that for the patient population in this study clinicians today often prescribe cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) 4/6 inhibitors in the first-line setting over conventional chemotherapy.

“But it is true that CDK 4/6 inhibitors, besides their cost, $10,000 a month, also are toxic to our patients. They cause neutropenias, increase infections, some diarrhea, so if there is a group I can potentially save from taking a CDK 4/6 inhibitor in the first-line setting I’d love to do that. In the metastatic setting what we’re trying to do for years is deescalate therapy, so the idea of giving chemotherapy instead of endocrine therapy is a little foreign to us,” Dr. Kaklamani said.

The strength of the study, however, is that it’s the first to show a survival benefit using CTCs as a diagnostic aid, she added.

Lisa A. Carey, MD, from the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, who was not involved in the study, said in an interview that the technology is promising, but not ready for prime time.

“To be honest, it didn’t appear to me that it helped very much, so that particular approach I don’t think is likely to have much benefit for patients. But the concept is an excellent one, and I do think that’s something we need to take home, that this is an area of an unmet need,” she said.

The study was funded by the National Cancer Institute of France, Institut Curie, and Menarini. Dr. Bidard reported receiving research funding and travel grants from Menarini. Dr. Kaklamani and Dr. Carey reported having no relevant conflicts of interest.

SOURCE: Bidard F-C et al. SABCS 2018, Abstract GS3-07.

SAN ANTONIO – Circulating tumor cell (CTC) counts could serve as a standalone biomarker for determining which patients with newly diagnosed estrogen receptor–positive, HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer are at high risk and should receive first-line chemotherapy and which are at low risk and could safely receive upfront hormonal therapy.

In the phase 3 STIC CTC trial, there were no significant differences in the primary endpoint of progression-free survival (PFS) or a secondary endpoint of overall survival (OS) between patients whose treatments were assigned according to the clinicians’ judgment and those whose treatments were chosen based on CTC count, reported Francois-Clement Bidard, MD, PhD, from Institut Curie in St. Cloud, France.

“CTC count should or may be included in the decision algorithm for hormone receptor–positive, HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer patients,” he said at the San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium.

The CTC investigators sought to compare CTC-driven clinical decisions with the clinicians choice for first-line therapy in 778 patients with hormone receptor–positive, HER2-negative breast cancer.

Patients were stratified by performance status (0-3), treatment center, and disease-free interval and were randomly assigned to receive therapy based on either the clinician’s judgment of the best course of therapy for each patient or to CTC count, with a cutoff of less than 5 CTC/7.5 mL indicating hormonal therapy and 5 CTC/7.5 mL or above indicating higher-risk disease requiring chemotherapy. In the clinician’s choice arm, the CTC reading was recorded but not implemented, and in the CTC arm, the clinician’s choice was dismissed.

The trial protocol did not specify a chemotherapy regimen, and patients initially assigned to chemotherapy were allowed to have maintenance hormonal therapy.

At 42 months of follow-up, median PFS in the CTC arm was 15.6 months, compared with 14.0 months in the clinician choice arm. The hazard ratio for PFS was 0.92 (90% confidence interval, 0.80-1.06), and the trial met its primary noninferiority endpoint with a prespecified noninferiority margin of 1.25.

The OS rate at 24 months in the CTC group was 82.1%, and in the clinician choice arm was 81.4% (nonsignificant).

Planned subgroup analyses in which the two decision methods were in agreement on whether a patient was at either low or high risk found no significant differences in either PFS or OS, showing that the CTC count complemented the prognostic estimate and isolated patients with either excellent or poor outcomes.


However, when the clinician rated the risk as low but the CTC count rated it as high (196 patients), PFS was significantly higher with CTC (HR, 0.62; P = .002). OS did not differ in this circumstance.

In an exploratory analysis combining all patients with discordant findings (clinician low/CTC high or vice versa), the investigators determined that chemotherapy would offer a significant advantage for both PFS (HR, 0.66; adjusted P = .001) and OS (HR, 0.65; adjusted P = .04).

Virginia Kaklamani, MD, leader of the breast cancer program at the University of Texas, San Antonio, who moderated a briefing where Dr. Bidard discussed the findings prior to presentation in a general session, said that she is not fully convinced that CTC counts can substitute for the clinician’s discretion. “I would probably want to see another study or some more data.”

She noted that for the patient population in this study clinicians today often prescribe cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) 4/6 inhibitors in the first-line setting over conventional chemotherapy.

“But it is true that CDK 4/6 inhibitors, besides their cost, $10,000 a month, also are toxic to our patients. They cause neutropenias, increase infections, some diarrhea, so if there is a group I can potentially save from taking a CDK 4/6 inhibitor in the first-line setting I’d love to do that. In the metastatic setting what we’re trying to do for years is deescalate therapy, so the idea of giving chemotherapy instead of endocrine therapy is a little foreign to us,” Dr. Kaklamani said.

The strength of the study, however, is that it’s the first to show a survival benefit using CTCs as a diagnostic aid, she added.

Lisa A. Carey, MD, from the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, who was not involved in the study, said in an interview that the technology is promising, but not ready for prime time.

“To be honest, it didn’t appear to me that it helped very much, so that particular approach I don’t think is likely to have much benefit for patients. But the concept is an excellent one, and I do think that’s something we need to take home, that this is an area of an unmet need,” she said.

The study was funded by the National Cancer Institute of France, Institut Curie, and Menarini. Dr. Bidard reported receiving research funding and travel grants from Menarini. Dr. Kaklamani and Dr. Carey reported having no relevant conflicts of interest.

SOURCE: Bidard F-C et al. SABCS 2018, Abstract GS3-07.

Unplanned pregnancy among women with epilepsy is associated with twice the risk of spontaneous fetal loss (SFL) when compared with women with epilepsy who planned their pregnancy, according to results from a retrospective study published online ahead of print October 15 in JAMA Neurology.

“This analysis adds the finding that unplanned pregnancy may increase the risk of SFL in women with epilepsy and identifies pregnancy planning, maternal age, and interpregnancy interval as significant modifiable variables,” said Andrew G. Herzog, MD, a neurologist at the Harvard Neuroendocrine Unit at Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center in Wellesley, Massachusetts, and colleagues.

The Epilepsy Birth Control Registry

The researchers examined results from a web-based survey completed by 1,144 women in the Epilepsy Birth Control Registry (EBCR) between 2010 and 2014. Respondents provided data on contraception use, pregnancy history, and antiepileptic drug (AED) treatment. Patients were between ages 18 and 47 (mean, 28.5). Approximately 8.7% of the cohort were minorities, and 39.8% had household incomes of $25,000 or less.

Pregnancy history data included number of pregnancies, number of planned or unplanned pregnancies, AED type used during pregnancies, and pregnancy outcomes such as live birth, induced abortion, and SFL. Patients were categorized as receiving no therapy, monotherapy, or polytherapy. AED use was further subdivided into no AED, enzyme-inducing AED, non–enzyme-inducing AED, enzyme-inhibiting AED, glucuronidated AED, and mixed.

Most Pregnancies Were Unplanned

Of 794 pregnancies, 530 (66.8%) were unplanned and 264 (33.2%) were planned. Outcomes included 473 live births (59.6%), 141 induced abortions (17.8%), and 180 SFLs (22.7%). Among patients who did not have an induced abortion, SFL risk was higher if the pregnancy was unplanned (137 patients, 35.0%), compared with planned (43 patients, 16.4%) The risk ratio (RR) of SFL was 2.14. According to a regression analysis, SFL risk was higher for patients where “planning was entered alone” in unplanned pregnancies (odds ratio [OR], 2.75), as well as when adjusted for AED category, maternal age, and interpregnancy interval (OR, 3.57).

There was an association between maternal age (OR, 0.957) and risk of SFL. Risk was lower in the 18- to 27-year-olds (118 patients; 29.5%; RR, 0.57) and 28- to 37-year-olds (44 patients; 20.8%; RR, 0.40), compared with the under-18 group (15 patients, 51.7%). Risk of SFL was related to interpregnancy interval (OR, 2.878). This risk was greater if the interpregnancy interval was under one year (56 patients, 45.9%), compared with one year (56 patients, 22.8%) or higher (RR, 2.02).

The Epilepsy Foun-dation and Lundbeck funded the study. Dr. Herzog reports grants, and two coauthors received salary support from grants, from the two organizations.

—Jeff Craven

Suggested Reading

Herzog AG, Mandle HB, MacEachern DB. Association of unintended pregnancy with spontaneous fetal loss in women with epilepsy: findings of the Epilepsy Birth Control Registry. JAMA Neurol. 2018 Oct 15 [Epub ahead of print].

Unplanned pregnancy among women with epilepsy is associated with twice the risk of spontaneous fetal loss (SFL) when compared with women with epilepsy who planned their pregnancy, according to results from a retrospective study published online ahead of print October 15 in JAMA Neurology.

“This analysis adds the finding that unplanned pregnancy may increase the risk of SFL in women with epilepsy and identifies pregnancy planning, maternal age, and interpregnancy interval as significant modifiable variables,” said Andrew G. Herzog, MD, a neurologist at the Harvard Neuroendocrine Unit at Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center in Wellesley, Massachusetts, and colleagues.

The Epilepsy Birth Control Registry

The researchers examined results from a web-based survey completed by 1,144 women in the Epilepsy Birth Control Registry (EBCR) between 2010 and 2014. Respondents provided data on contraception use, pregnancy history, and antiepileptic drug (AED) treatment. Patients were between ages 18 and 47 (mean, 28.5). Approximately 8.7% of the cohort were minorities, and 39.8% had household incomes of $25,000 or less.

Pregnancy history data included number of pregnancies, number of planned or unplanned pregnancies, AED type used during pregnancies, and pregnancy outcomes such as live birth, induced abortion, and SFL. Patients were categorized as receiving no therapy, monotherapy, or polytherapy. AED use was further subdivided into no AED, enzyme-inducing AED, non–enzyme-inducing AED, enzyme-inhibiting AED, glucuronidated AED, and mixed.

Most Pregnancies Were Unplanned

Of 794 pregnancies, 530 (66.8%) were unplanned and 264 (33.2%) were planned. Outcomes included 473 live births (59.6%), 141 induced abortions (17.8%), and 180 SFLs (22.7%). Among patients who did not have an induced abortion, SFL risk was higher if the pregnancy was unplanned (137 patients, 35.0%), compared with planned (43 patients, 16.4%) The risk ratio (RR) of SFL was 2.14. According to a regression analysis, SFL risk was higher for patients where “planning was entered alone” in unplanned pregnancies (odds ratio [OR], 2.75), as well as when adjusted for AED category, maternal age, and interpregnancy interval (OR, 3.57).

There was an association between maternal age (OR, 0.957) and risk of SFL. Risk was lower in the 18- to 27-year-olds (118 patients; 29.5%; RR, 0.57) and 28- to 37-year-olds (44 patients; 20.8%; RR, 0.40), compared with the under-18 group (15 patients, 51.7%). Risk of SFL was related to interpregnancy interval (OR, 2.878). This risk was greater if the interpregnancy interval was under one year (56 patients, 45.9%), compared with one year (56 patients, 22.8%) or higher (RR, 2.02).

The Epilepsy Foun-dation and Lundbeck funded the study. Dr. Herzog reports grants, and two coauthors received salary support from grants, from the two organizations.

—Jeff Craven

Suggested Reading

Herzog AG, Mandle HB, MacEachern DB. Association of unintended pregnancy with spontaneous fetal loss in women with epilepsy: findings of the Epilepsy Birth Control Registry. JAMA Neurol. 2018 Oct 15 [Epub ahead of print].

Unplanned pregnancy among women with epilepsy is associated with twice the risk of spontaneous fetal loss (SFL) when compared with women with epilepsy who planned their pregnancy, according to results from a retrospective study published online ahead of print October 15 in JAMA Neurology.

“This analysis adds the finding that unplanned pregnancy may increase the risk of SFL in women with epilepsy and identifies pregnancy planning, maternal age, and interpregnancy interval as significant modifiable variables,” said Andrew G. Herzog, MD, a neurologist at the Harvard Neuroendocrine Unit at Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center in Wellesley, Massachusetts, and colleagues.

The Epilepsy Birth Control Registry

The researchers examined results from a web-based survey completed by 1,144 women in the Epilepsy Birth Control Registry (EBCR) between 2010 and 2014. Respondents provided data on contraception use, pregnancy history, and antiepileptic drug (AED) treatment. Patients were between ages 18 and 47 (mean, 28.5). Approximately 8.7% of the cohort were minorities, and 39.8% had household incomes of $25,000 or less.

Pregnancy history data included number of pregnancies, number of planned or unplanned pregnancies, AED type used during pregnancies, and pregnancy outcomes such as live birth, induced abortion, and SFL. Patients were categorized as receiving no therapy, monotherapy, or polytherapy. AED use was further subdivided into no AED, enzyme-inducing AED, non–enzyme-inducing AED, enzyme-inhibiting AED, glucuronidated AED, and mixed.

Most Pregnancies Were Unplanned

Of 794 pregnancies, 530 (66.8%) were unplanned and 264 (33.2%) were planned. Outcomes included 473 live births (59.6%), 141 induced abortions (17.8%), and 180 SFLs (22.7%). Among patients who did not have an induced abortion, SFL risk was higher if the pregnancy was unplanned (137 patients, 35.0%), compared with planned (43 patients, 16.4%) The risk ratio (RR) of SFL was 2.14. According to a regression analysis, SFL risk was higher for patients where “planning was entered alone” in unplanned pregnancies (odds ratio [OR], 2.75), as well as when adjusted for AED category, maternal age, and interpregnancy interval (OR, 3.57).

There was an association between maternal age (OR, 0.957) and risk of SFL. Risk was lower in the 18- to 27-year-olds (118 patients; 29.5%; RR, 0.57) and 28- to 37-year-olds (44 patients; 20.8%; RR, 0.40), compared with the under-18 group (15 patients, 51.7%). Risk of SFL was related to interpregnancy interval (OR, 2.878). This risk was greater if the interpregnancy interval was under one year (56 patients, 45.9%), compared with one year (56 patients, 22.8%) or higher (RR, 2.02).

The Epilepsy Foun-dation and Lundbeck funded the study. Dr. Herzog reports grants, and two coauthors received salary support from grants, from the two organizations.

—Jeff Craven

Suggested Reading

Herzog AG, Mandle HB, MacEachern DB. Association of unintended pregnancy with spontaneous fetal loss in women with epilepsy: findings of the Epilepsy Birth Control Registry. JAMA Neurol. 2018 Oct 15 [Epub ahead of print].